Thursday, January 16, 2014

If Charlton Warren Lands at Nebraska, Misperceptions of Pelini Are Destroyed

By most accounts, Nebraska will be announcing that Air Force defensive coordinator Charlton Warren will become Nebraska's newest secondary coach in the next few days, replacing Terry Joseph, who's now at Texas A&M. Sad to see Joseph go, who was a definite upgrade over Corey Raymond. Hopefully it was a case where Joseph wanted to be back in the SEC, as opposed to a money situation.  You'd like to think that Nebraska has the funds to properly compensate a coach like Joseph.

Warren is an unknown in these parts; he's not a big name. That certainly disappoints people who wanted a "splashy" hire.  (Not sure who would be a "splashy" hire, other than maybe Ron Zook.) His background as a secondary coach is pretty good, considering the unique characteristics of service academies. In 2010, the Falcons finished second in pass defense in division 1-A; in 2011, third.  Granted, that's against Mountain West competition, but that's a decent track record.

Some people hate the hire.  That's fine, though I believe it's impossible to really evaluate the hire at this time. The proof will come in the fall, not now.  That doesn't stop people from firing their criticism.  "Nebraska didn't make a splashy hire."  Fine.  "Nebraska settled for Warren because Pelini couldn't hire anybody better."  Maybe.  "Nebraska couldn't hire anybody better because of all of the uncertainty over Pelini's future."

Stop right there. Warren left his alma mater after NINE seasons for a job where he's likely out of a job in less than a year?  Is that your point?  Better try again...

Has Warren struggled as a defensive coordinator?  It kind of looks that way.  He might not be cut out to be a defensive playcaller. Nothing wrong with that. Bill Callahan, by all accounts, might be one of the best offensive line coaches in football today. Not so good as an offensive coordinator.  (And we won't go into the clusterfools of his head coaching career.) So he steps back into a role that it appears that he excels at - and at a school where he can coach better athletes.

Up to now, people have criticized Bo Pelini because he "only hires his buddies".  Well, that narrative gets bombed by this hire. There's no lineage between Pelini, Youngstown, and Warren. This hire is outside the box that people have tried to frame Pelini with.

On KOZN-1620 AM this morning, Gary Sharp and Damon Benning interviewed an Air Force beat writer about Warren.  He said that Warren has had opportunities to leave before for better jobs, but hasn't done so until now. That seems to speak of the opportunity at Nebraska.
I think this is an intriguing hire. Not saying it's great.  It doesn't look bad, though.  We'll have to wait and see, though.

And the critics are going to have to come up with some new material.  Maybe they'll revert back to Pellllini, which seems to be their tired and tested formula.

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Why Does Peyton Manning Keep Calling "Omaha! Omaha!"?

Peyton Manning's #OmahaOmaha snap count has had much of the football world abuzz over what he means.
The talking heads on ESPN tried to make some sense of it this week, now that it's gone viral.
Of course, it's not really new. Former Chicago Bear Brian Urlacher said months ago that it was code to direct the play the other direction. (i.e. "Omaha" = "Opposite side of field")
Today, Manning finally clued everybody in as to what it means.  Well, kind of.
OK, so it's not a punt. Knowing how special teams work around here, that's probably a wise choice.

Thursday, January 02, 2014

Sorry Alabama, 1993-97 Nebraska Still Reigns As The Greatest Five Year Run in College Football

Last year, we heard the claim from Alabama that the modern Nick Saban era is the greatest in college football, with three national championships in four years. Nebraska fans countered by pointing out that Nebraska played for four in five seasons, and almost played for five straight in the mid 90's.

Well, now let's look at the tale of the tape.  Nebraska went 60-3 from 1993 through 1997.

Alabama's record?  60-7 after tonight's loss to Oklahoma.

Close, to be sure.  Impressive, most definitely.  But Nebraska's five year run still reigns supreme.

Oh...and I couldn't resist this:

Wednesday, January 01, 2014

Huskers Survive Late Georgia Push At the Gator Bowl

Pick your narrative:  Another four-loss season for Nebraska.  Or, Nebraska beat an SEC team on New Year's Day.

They're both right, of course. It all comes down to how you want to view this game and this season. There were a lot of good things to like:  Ameer Abdulllah rushing for 122 yards. Nebraska going +1 on turnover margin. Todd Gurley being held to just 86 yards rushing. The Blackshirts holding Georgia to four field goals in the first three quarters.  Andrew Green playing one of his best games ever in his last game for the Huskers.

And a few things to dislike: Unable to cover Georgia tight end Arthur Lynch for most of the game, and then Gurley in the fourth quarter.  Tommy Armstrong underthrowing quite a few passes in the rain.

Biggest, of course, was Nebraska winning the turnover battle. Some thought that was impossible, especially in the rain.  Frankly, could Nebraska have won this game without the turnovers?  I suspect not, because Nebraska struggled with sustaining drives all day. The touchdown drives were 2 plays (14 yards), 7 plays (38 yards), and 3 plays (95 yards).  Nebraska's best drive of the day was actually a 9 play driver for 48 yards that led to a field goal in the second quarter.  (If Jamal Turner makes that catch in the end zone, it becomes a 77 yard touchdown drive and the game takes an entirely different tone.)

Yes, that was a better drive than the 95 yarder. Mind you, the touchdown pass from Armstrong to Quincy Enunwa was the undisputed play of the day, but it followed a fumbled snap that Armstrong miraculously was able to keep an inch shy of the goal line. I don't think it'll ever be possible to watch a longer Nebraska touchdown pass, mostly because it would be nearly impossible to get the ball placed any closer to the goal line without it being a safety.  That 99.9 touchdown pass may be matched at some point down the line with another 99 yarder on the stat sheet, but Enunwa's 99.9 yarder will always be the longest.

The Blackshirts played well at times, except in covering all-SEC tight end Arthur Lynch and Gurley.  Both are physical mismatches, though.  The NFL will be drooling over Gurley for the next 16 months, and Lynch is going to be playing on Sunday's this fall.  Some people will point out that Gurley wasn't 100% today, but by all reports, he was healthier today than he's been since mid-October.  And today, Nebraska held him to his lowest yards per carry average (4.1) of the season.

And that's the story of the 2013 season. When the season began, the story line was asking whether Bo Pelini could coach defense anymore.  Other than the first half of the UCLA game, Nebraska's defense seemed to still be suffering from the Wisconsin-scored-again syndrome for the entire month of September. We saw little bits of improvement in October, but in November, we saw the formation of a Bo Pelini defense. It's not quite there yet, but there's a sound foundation of freshmen and sophomores that could make Nebraska a formidable force the next couple of years.

Offensively, Armstrong had his moments today, but he's still got some improvement to make in reading defenses and adjusting to field conditions.  Today, he was short on many of his passes.  He wasn't short - or long - on the play of the day, and that's important.  When a receiver is that open, you cannot overthrow him.  Rule #1 - make sure the ball is catchable.  Throwing it to the receiver in stride is merely a bonus.  I don't think that Armstrong has locked up the starting quarterback position for 2014, but it'll take quite the effort by Johnny Stanton to overtake him in the spring and summer.

The big question for the next couple of weeks is watching to see what Ameer Abdullah chooses to do. A lot of people think that he'll head for the NFL, knowing that running backs only have so many carries in their legs.  It would be hard to argue against that decision, except to mention this.  Abdullah's one liability is his ball security; he improved this season, but his five fumbles is only one less than Tulsa's Trey Watts, the most fumble-prone running back in college football this season.  The NFL will keep that in mind...and more importantly, he probably won't have as much of a chance to improve on that in the pros.  Look at Rex Burkhead, who only played in one game for the Bengals this season.  You may only get one chance to prove yourself to the NFL, and unless Abdullah thinks he's headed for a multi-year career in the NFL, he's best advised to build his resume in his senior season.

And if Abdullah returns in 2014, things set up rather nicely for Nebraska to finally break out of that four-loss "rut". (There are worse things than that, mind you.)  Already, this winter and spring sets up to be a little more positive thanks to a bowl victory on New Year's Day.

Tuesday, December 31, 2013

The Backyard Ice Rink Project - Part 2: Heat, Wind, & Leaves

On Christmas Day, the kids enjoyed a little hockey on the backyard ice rink just before lunchtime. It was a beautiful afternoon and the kids had a lot of fun out on the ice.
And over the next few days, the weather got even nicer. My thermometer says it hit 60 on Saturday...which was bad news for the ice rink. A cold front rolled through Saturday night and the temperature plummeted as the winds howled.  And when I returned from my in-laws on Sunday, I had an unpleasant discovery.

Leaves.  Melting.  And leaking.

In trying not to put holes in my liner, I didn't fasten the liner to the boards...and that appears to be a major mistake.  In the warmth, the ice pulled back from the boards, and the melting water leaked out.  Even worse, as the winds howled, in came leaves from all over the neighborhood.  Even a plastic chair that I had placed next to the rink as a "penalty box" and bench blew onto the ice.  And froze.

Some of the leaves could be removed by taking the shovel and scraping the surface.  The chair needed a good pull to free it from the ice, but it was easy to remove.  The rest of the leaves are probably there for the duration of the winter, but if I get enough water on top of it, they'll become hidden.

Except now any water I pour on top runs off the ice and out into the yard.  How to fix that?  Good question.  My first attempt to fix this problem is to take some rolled up newspaper and jam it into the cracks to occupy space.  I then poured a small amount of water on the paper to soak it and freeze it in place.  So far so good.  The remainder of the gap probably can be filled with the snow that scheduled to fall tomorrow.  I'll bank it against the boards after the Husker game tomorrow afternoon, and resume the fill process.

Tuesday, December 24, 2013

UNO Hockey Coach Dean Blais Suspended 3 Games for Improper Reimbursement of Jaycob Megna's Stolen Watch

The World-Herald reports that UNO hockey coach Dean Blais and junior defensemen Jaycob Megna have been suspended for the Mavericks' next three games because the UNO athletic department doesn't understand the NCAA's rules over theft of student-athlete property.

The abridged version of the story:  During a game against Bemidji State in October 2012, Megna's watch disappeared from the locker room. Sophomore Aaron Pearce also reported the loss of $100 at that time.  The incident was reported to MECA, the organization that operates the CenturyLink Center where the Mavs play.  The watch and the money have not been recovered.

UNO internally determined that the athletic department could not replace the watch under NCAA rules.  Sounds like one of those cases where the NCAA's rules prohibit people from doing the right thing, right?

Wrong.  In this situation, it is allowed by the NCAA.  UNO just didn't realize it.

The story continued, and over time, the story shifted from the NCAA not allowing the reimbursement to UNO not being able to afford the $400 reimbursement.  That's downright ridiculous.  Last spring, Megna went ahead and replaced the watch himself.  Blais learned of it, and gave him the $400 replacement cost.

That's the NCAA violation.  Should Dean Blais know better?  Yes.  But he was doing the right thing by the student athlete.

And in the end, UNO did eventually realize they could reimburse Megna after all, but it was too late.  And once the Ha Ha Clinton-Cix situation at Alabama became known, Blais recognized that he had also done wrong.

Bottom line:  Megna and Blais will miss the New Hampshire series the first weekend of January as well as the Friday night game against Minnesota-Duluth the week after.  Megna also has to donate $400 to charity.

UNO says that they'll improve security around their locker room, which is all fine and well.  Shouldn't that really be MECA's responsibility anyway?

But more importantly, who in the compliance department is going to be held accountable for not getting the correct answer from the NCAA in the first place?  It's a shame that Blais and Megna have to pay the price for UNO's screw-up.

A lot of good things are happening around UNO athletics.  Just look at UNO men's basketball, who now have an RPI higher than Nebraska ... and Michigan .... and UCLA, for crying out loud.
And all this in spite of administrative functions that aren't working.  This is the same organization who is trying to build a 7,500 seat arena for a hockey team that averages nearly 8,000 fans a game.  And last week sent out a survey five times to season ticketholders to gauge how much more fans want to pay to watch UNO hockey.

Here's a thought for UNO.  Put the arena plans back in the file drawer...and fix the support system for these sports first. When UNO can't do the basic things right, how can you build an $80 million arena that's already questionable?

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

The Backyard Ice Rink Project - Part 1

Hockey for me was an acquired taste; I never grew up around the game once. I do recall my father taking me to an Omaha Knights game at Ak-Sar-Ben when I was a kid, and occasionally we'd play hockey in the gym in our sneakers in elementary school, but that was it. It wasn't until that famous "worst-to-first" season for the Omaha Lancers in 1990 that I actually started to follow the sport to any sort of detail. And, of course, ever since UNO, my alma mater, started playing the sport, I've been a fan. But I've never played the game on ice; I can't even skate. (Roller or ice.)

As my son has grown, he's become more and more infatuated with the sport. He started as a toddler, using a kiddie golf club as a hockey stick. The grandparents picked up on it, and gave him a couple of kids' hockey sets, which he plays over and over in the kitchen and living room. But it wasn't until he attended a USA Hockey "Try Hockey for Free" event last winter that he'd made it onto the ice. And it was love at first skate; he had an absolute blast. When we left, he kept asking when he could go back to the rink again.

A week later, we had a nice sized snowstorm, and the inspiration was set. My wife's cousin had given us a couple pairs of old kids' ice skates, and I'd seen people building ice rinks in their back yard before. What have I got to lose?

So a day after the snow fell, I went into the back yard, and stomped down a patch of snow for a base, and shoveled some snow around the area for a frame.  First problem, the hose was froze solid.  So my backup plan was buckets of water hauled from the kitchen sink.  Which actually worked fairly well, because it poured evenly and slowly built up an ice surface.  A few buckets of water in the morning, a few more when I got home from work, and a few more  just before going to bed.  And slowly but surely, a rudimentary ice rink formed.

Very rudimentary, mind you.  The back yard slopes, and the drift at the low end leaked.  Most of the rink was an ice-covered snow crust with all of the bumps and ridges you'd expect.  Yes it sucked.

Didn't matter...the kids loved it.  So much so that after the first snowfall in November, my son asked if I could build him a rink.  Nevermind it was only about a half-inch in grassy areas, he wanted to skate again.

More importantly, I had been planning on "Rink 2.0" anyway, and it wasn't going to be dependent on snow.  (At least, that was my plan.)  Last year's snow base was barely functional; the leaves and grass burned through the ice and created a pathway for water to leak out.  So I ordered a white rink liner (essentially a big white tarp) from Blue Lake Plastics in Minnesota to be the base.  On Thanksgiving weekend, after the final yard mowing, I set out to frame the rink.  Surplus shelving from Menards became the boards at the "low end", held in place by garden spikes pounded into the ground. And then, I waited for cold weather, which arrived a week ago.  With snow in the forecast, I knew I had to act fast, so the rink liner went down the first Saturday of December.  And in went the water.

Because the temperature was hovering near 0, I couldn't get the outside faucet to work, so I had to run the hose from the bathroom to fill the rink.  (I'm sure my wife loved having the patio door gapping open two inches all afternoon for the hose.)  And the rink slowly filled in.  And then I found my first mistake: folding the excess tarp on top of the rink instead of underneath.  As the water poured in, the second layer of tarp floated up on top of the water.  Whoops.

Moving a cold tarp full of water in single degree weather is not a lot of fun, so I managed to fold the excess tarp underneath so I could resume the fill.  And voila, the rink slowly filled.  Until I found the next issue:  I didn't set the tarp high high enough on the boards or attach them.  I didn't want to put holes in the liner, so I didn't nail it in place, so it sagged and gapped...which let water spill over the sides.  So I stopped the pour and decided to think of alternatives.
Started out with a decent rink, though.  Three inches of snow overnight ensured that the rink was fairly well frozen in place, and gave me a solution to the water leaking over the edge of the tarp.  A combination of saran wrap along the boards to cover the opening between the boards and the tarp, then packed in place with snow, and then a little water to freeze it in place.  Not wanting to risk more leaks by resorting to the hose, I reverted back to last year's tried and true method of filling the rink: two three-gallon buckets.  While one fills in the kitchen sink, I take the other out to the rink and pour it out over the ice.  A very slow and painstaking process over the last week, but it's functional.  By this weekend, only two high spots remain on my rink.

To solve those, I take what snow is left and mix it with some water to create a slush mix that I packed into those high spots to protect the liner and allow some sort of skating to take place.  After that freezes, I can then pour water on those areas and build up some ice there as well.

And voila...by Monday afternoon, the rink appears to be finally ready.  Except Mother Nature has graced us with some 45 degree weather...which is bad for a rink.  Fortunately, it held pretty solid the first day.  I've cut back on adding water, because it's not going to freeze.  Over the weekend, I was dumping about 30 gallons of water 3-4 times a day, which built up a nice surface.  Now, I'm just hoping it stays fairly solid, and more importantly, doesn't leak out all over the backyard.

The forecast for the next couple of days is for temps in the 40's, dipping back below freezing at night.  That should mitigate any melting.  By later this week, and next week, colder weather should be back and allow me to finish pouring enough water to smooth out that rough area at the high point of the yard.  At the other end, the ice is a foot deep at that point, and the kids have already skated on it.

Will there be a Christmas backyard hockey game at my house?  That's the hope.  Stay tuned for more updates on the backyard ice rink project. So far, so good.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Eddie Robinson Coach of the Year Ballot

In the interests of full disclosure, I'm posting my ballot for the Eddie Robinson Coach of the Year, as sponsored by the Football Writers Association of America.  And yes, this is not a misprint, or a joke:
  1. Gary Pinkel, Missouri
  2. David Cutcliffe, Duke
  3. Art Briles, Baylor
  4. Gus Malzahn, Auburn
  5. Jimbo Fisher, Florida State
  6. Mark Dantonio, Michigan State
  7. David Shaw, Stanford
  8. George O'Leary, Central Florida
Why Pinkel? No, I'm not trolling AJ the Huskerh8er. But let's be honest. Nobody, other than the most die-hard black and gold Tiger fan thought Missouri was going to play in Atlanta. Well, maybe, just maybe, if everything goes perfectly, maybe the Chick-fil-A Bowl on New Years Eve. 

They made it to the effin' SEC title game.  Yeah, Missouri.  Heck, even SB Nation's own Mizzou guy, Bill Connelly was hoping for a top 20 team, but predicting a 7 win team. And fearing that Pinkel's seat was going to smolder this season.

Cutcliffe took Duke to the ACC title game.  Yes, Duke.  Granted, they got blasted by Florida State, but still...it's Duke.  Art Briles would win a coach of the decade for making Baylor relevant, but I'm not so sure they just didn't emerge from a rather weak Big XII. 

Monday, December 09, 2013

Creighton Admits Doc Sadler Was Right

When he was still Nebraska's basketball coach, Doc Sadler always found one way to get under the skin of a Creighton basketball fan...and that's by pointing out that, historically, the Creighton/Nebraska basketball game wasn't worth that much to Nebraska.
"A loss to Creighton hurts us. A win over Creighton, the only thing it does is make our fans happy. It doesn't help you come Selection Sunday. That's just the way it is."
Of course, there is a bit of "that was then, this is now" to consider about that statement. Back then, Creighton was playing in the Missouri Valley Conference, and frequently needing to win out in St. Louis to assure themselves of an NCAA tournament berth. Creighton needed that game against Nebraska to boost their RPI to improve their chances of an at-large berth. And when Sadler (or Barry Collier prior to that) talked about not wanting to play the game in Omaha, that riled up Bluejay fans to no end.

And that was then.  Creighton now finds themselves in a major conference with their own national television network. They'll have all of the RPI-enhancing games they need on their conference schedule. But now there's a new twist on the debate over whether Nebraska's division 1 basketball teams should play.

It's UNO.  UNO has quietly put together an impressive start this season, beating opponents in common with both Nebraska and Creighton by comparable margins in the early part of this season.  The Mavericks' basketball team isn't eligible to play in the NCAA tournament yet, and won't for a couple more seasons.  But the RPI is there, and it's a more-than-respectable 157.  Not bad for a Summit League team playing their third season out of of division 2.

Nebraska played UNO last year in Lincoln.  Creighton hasn't scheduled UNO ever since the Mavs left division 2.  Why not?  It's a question Tom Shatel asked Creighton head coach Greg McDermott.  McDermott's answer essentially backed up what Doc Sadler said years before:
“We evaluate our schedule every year and we're going to schedule what fits Creighton best. If UNO fits that, it's something we would consider.”
In other words... don't look for it, especially on a UNO home court. Nevermind that it would be good for the local sports scene.  UNO's RPI will never be good enough (as a Summit League team) to help the RPI of a team like Nebraska or Creighton with a victory. And the risk of losing to the "little brother" is far too great to take that chance. That's why Creighton hasn't played UNO since 2009...and probably won't again.  Creighton is "going to schedule what fits Creighton best."

Five years ago, Creighton fans were miffed when Doc Sadler talked about scheduling what would fit Nebraska the best. Turns out Doc was right after all...otherwise, Creighton would gladly be looking to schedule UNO in basketball.



Friday, December 06, 2013

Bo Pelini May Underperform to Fan Standards, But May Outperform His Peers

Zach Tegler of the Daily Nebraskan took a peek at Bo Pelini's record in his first six years as a head coach, and compared it to the records of other first-time head coaches.  The numbers jump out at you:
Of the 2,053 men who have ever coached major college football, 107 – about 5 percent – had winning percentages of .706 or better through five seasons.
Of those 107 coaches, 43 are in the College Football Hall of Fame. Sixty-two worked before World War II. And eight – much less than 1 percent – won nine games in each of their first five seasons as a head coach.

Of those eight, only one inherited a team with a losing record.
His name is Bo Pelini. CornNation's Paul Dalen did some other research that shows that it takes time and experience for most national championship coaches to reach that level.  Is that a case that Tom Osborne should not have hired Bo Pelini back in 2007?  You could definitely argue that, though that point is moot  now.

It reminds me of another coach out there that many argue is the new standard.  What were his records his first six seasons?  9-2, 6-5-1, 6-6, 7-5, 6-6, 9-2.  Grand total: 43-26-1.  "Four L" Pelini's record in comparison? 57-24.

Who is that other coach?  You may have heard of him.  He's Nick Saban.  And yes, Pelini's record far exceeds Saban's over the first six seasons.

Wednesday, December 04, 2013

Huskerland: Bo Pelini, Through a Parent's Eyes

Over the year's, I've periodically heard from the extended family of a few players over Bo Pelini, and the type of man Bo Pelini is away from the podium and off the sideline. It's just one more reason I believe that Bo Pelini is a special coach, who's trying to do things the right way.  Today, I received a link to this story about what Joe Johns, parent of a Nebraska reserve defensive tackle, had to say about Pelini:

Earlier this year, Joe and his son Garret attended a Football team dinner, where Joe had talked with several other parents and they all felt the same way about Bo. They all felt that Bo had their child’s best intentions in mind with everything he did, he pushed them in the classroom and on the field. They believed in Bo as well.
Joe had also attended a few practices this year and said that they were tough practices, the guys were really “popping” the pads he said and going full throttle. Joe was reminded of the Bob Devaney days and in some ways compared Bo to Bob Devaney, in how much he expected out of his players and how he wanted nothing but 110% effort from them during practice. He couldn’t stress enough how good the practices were.
Joe talked about the academics portion of the football team, and its expectations, he said that almost 80% of the team is on the B1G honor roll list. He stated that Bo is a big stickler for classroom attendance and participation. He really puts the Student before the Athlete, as it should be.
Read the rest of the article at Huskerland.

Tuesday, December 03, 2013

Dirk Chatelain Considers the AP Poll an "Objective" Measurement

On Monday, Dirk Chatelain continued his ongoing series of analyzing Nebraska football under Bo Pelini. Based on his tweet, I thought this one would be different.
As objectively as possible?  Well, I'm intrigued, despite the source, so I click the link.
Since that moment, this is where the Huskers have started in the AP poll and finished in the AP poll.
2010: Started 8th, finished 20th
2011: Started 10th, finished 23rd
2012: Started 17th, finished 25th
2013: Started 18th, currently tied for 36th (only 35 teams received a vote)
So each of the past three years, the preseason expectation has been lower than the year before. And each of the past four years, NU has finished at least eight spots lower than where it started.
Those are facts.

Yep... That's right. Chatelain's "as objectively as possible" is the AP poll.  That's right:  an opinion poll.

What's the definition of "objective"?
not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.
In other words, Chatelain's best shot at "as objectively as possible" is not objective by any definition.  The "facts" that Chatelain use are completely opinion based.

If you like Pelini (like I do), you consider Chatelain to be leading a group of media members who have been laying the case for Pelini to be fired.  Those media members take issue to that:
They are technically correct.  Chatelain, Severe, and John Bishop have not specifically called for Pelini to be fired. But that doesn't mean that the complaint isn't valid either. I played that same game in the early years of this blog. When it was Bill Callahan who was the Nebraska coach, I stated my case why Callahan was failing.  I never actually called for Callahan to be fired, though.  I knew that wasn't going to happen as long as Steve Pederson was athletic director.  And once Pederson was fired, the case for dismissing Callahan was so blatantly obvious that I still didn't need to make that call.

All I did was keep adding more and more reasons why Callahan wasn't working out at Nebraska.

Same thing Chatelain is doing now.  The only difference is that I wouldn't  deny that I wanted Callahan out of Lincoln.

The critics who try to make the "objective" case that Pelini is failing won't be that honest with you.

Saturday, November 30, 2013

Eichorst Slaps Down Unfounded Speculation From Local Media; Continues to Support Bo Pelini

Nebraska athletic director Shawn Eichorst gave Bo Pelini his version of the "1000%" vote of confidence Saturday morning, and also took issue with the speculation that Pelini was even on the hot seat in the first place.
"My approach has always been to not comment publicly about our coaches until their full seasons are complete, as I strongly believe it is unfair and counter to best practices. However, given the volume of unfounded speculation and conjecture about our head football coach, I want to reaffirm what I have said many times since I have arrived at the University of Nebraska -- that I positively respect, appreciate and support our football student-athletes, coaches and staff, as we do everyone in the Husker family. We very much look forward to our upcoming bowl game and Coach Pelini continuing to lead our program in the future."
 Emphasis added for clarity. Except that many of the people driving the speculation aren't giving up their case:

Yep...still at it. Read the last statement again:  "...look forward to upcoming bowl game and Coach Pelini continuing to lead our program in the future."  Bowl game and the future... i.e. beyond.  Some say that since he didn't say 2014 that the future only includes the bowl game.  That's trying to read way, way too much into Eichorst's statement.

Eichorst didn't say 2014 because he didn't want to read any limits as to his support for Pelini as head coach. Lots of recruits on campus right now, and there's no need for anybody to read this as only a one year endorsement. It's open-ended and ongoing.

Eichorst's statement also makes it clear that he would have preferred to wait until after the bowl game, but the "unfounded speculation and conjecture" forced him to respond now. If he wanted to wait, he simply could have indicated that "end of season" meant "after the bowl game" and left himself an opening. He did no such thing.
Let's make it clear:  Pelini is going to be Nebraska's head football coach.  Period.
What I find most curious is that the statement appeared on BTN.com almost simultaneously to the local media starting to tweet about it's existence. Clearly, the statement was sent to Chicago first and subsequently released to the "Local Media" once BTN was ready to post it.
Note the "Local Media" in this version of the message. That's not my creation; that's how it came from Lincoln.  And it was a nonverbal message to the World-Herald and various sports talk hosts driving the "Pelini Hot Seat" theme that the athletic department is none-too-pleased with the volume of the speculation.

As it is, I'm pleasantly surprised, if not downright shocked, that Pelini is returning. I've felt Pelini has done as good of a job as possible resurrecting the Nebraska defense as well as dealing with the injuries on offense. Eight wins is a very sub-par season for Nebraska, but teams that lose an award-winning quarterback usually struggle. (Did anybody see what Green Bay has become on Thanksgiving?)

I do have to wonder if some of yesterday's meltdowns could have been avoided if Eichorst had given a private message of support earlier this week after Pelini discussed the issues of the "hot seat" narrative.  Certainly, Pelini was on edge and may have felt that he had nothing to lose yesterday. That might explain that fake punt or going for it on fourth down in Nebraska territory in the fourth quarter.

And I suspect Shawn Eichorst might not have wondered the same thing over the last 24 hours.




Friday, November 29, 2013

More Turnovers and Awful Fake Punt Call Doom Huskers Against Iowa

Today's Nebraska football game against Iowa almost has become a sideshow to the "Is Bo Pelini being fired or not?" storyline.  Or in the eyes of some, it's not "if" but rather "when".  I'll cut to the chase: I don't believe Bo Pelini should be fired.  That doesn't mean that I'm happy with an 8-4 record, but considering the circumstances that got Nebraska to this point (young defense and 12 players on the two-deep offensive roster), 8-4 is actually a fairly good record. (Did anybody see yesterday what the Green Bay Packers are like without Aaron Rodgers?  That's what injuries at key positions and with this quantity can do to a team.)

Starting out the day, I thought Nebraska was going to have a good day offensively until Taariq Allen got penalized for stepping out of bounds before catching a 32 yard pass down to the Iowa 17 yard line. Next play, a bad interception. Two plays later, another bad interception.  7-0 Iowa.

More special teams blunders put Nebraska inside their own five yard line, and the resulting punt gave Iowa another short field.  Now it was 14-0, and things were looking awfully bleak at halftime.  Nebraska did put together a really nice drive to open the third quarter, and it seemed to be game on.  Until the refs decided to penalize Zaire Anderson for pass interference on a pass thrown 15 feet over C.J. Fiedorowicz's head.  Horrible call.  Then the officials flagged Pelini 15 yards for apparently waiving his hat too close to the referee.  Still Nebraska didn't seem to be out of the game until Pelini made one of the worst call's of his coaching career.

Kirk Ferentz smelled it coming, and called time out.  Just to be on the safe side, he sent his base defense back out onto the field.  And the fake punt was stuffed in Nebraska territory.  One play later: Boom... 24-10.  Still, it wasn't over.  Nebraska battled back, and after a defensive stop, Nebraska seemed ready to finally mount the comeback over their mistakes.  And then another happened, as Ameer Abdullah got popped in the helmet and fumbled.  And that's all she wrote.  Nebraska got desperate late, going for an ill-advised fourth down on their side of the field to allow a garbage touchdown late.  That was the ball game.

A short postgame press conference seemed to signify where this is heading.  Pelini called the pass interference a "chicken-sh*t" call.  He was both right - and wrong.  Right, because it was a bad call.  Wrong, because Pelini can't say that in public. At the very least, Pelini will likely be sanctioned by the Big Ten for publicly criticizing the refs.

Unless, of course, Shawn Eichorst acts first.  I didn't really believe it before today.  I sense most people didn't believe it before today.  But now, everybody seems to.  And it's pretty darn clear this one could be even more divisive than the Solich firing ten years ago if it's not handled correctly. Fans are clearly split on whether Pelini should stay or go. But making it even tougher are the comments of the players; they clearly love Pelini and stand behind their coach 1000% percent.

Should that count for something? It should.  But I'm not sure what formula Eichorst will use in making this decision. And neither does anybody else outside of One Memorial Stadium.  But here's how I would evaluate the situation:  I'd sit down and ask Bo what went wrong and what needs to change moving forward.  Eichorst played the game, and it's his responsibility to determine if that's truly going to take Nebraska to the next level.

I don't know if that's what Eichorst will do. I just hope that Nebraska still has a chance of avoiding another nuclear winter like 2003-04.

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

B1G Power Poll, Week 14

This week's poll is much like the others... very few changes, and in the lower part.  Pretty much know who is where now.
  1. Ohio State
  2. Wisconsin
  3. Michigan State
  4. Nebraska
  5. Iowa
  6. Minnesota
  7. Michigan
  8. Penn State
  9. Northwestern
  10. Indiana
  11. Illinois
  12. Purdue
The rest of the CornNation.com Power Poll ballots should be posted to CN in the next day or so...

Monday, November 25, 2013

Taking Issue with the Omaha World-Herald

No, this has nothing to do with Dirk Chatelain. This is the business of the World-Herald, not any complaint about the editorial quality (or lack thereof) with Omaha's daily newspaper.

I'm a subscriber. I know I can read the paper online, but I still like getting the dead tree issue of the paper. Call me an old fogie if you wish. What I find curious is that as more and people drop their subscriptions because of the price, the World-Herald keeps increasing their rates.  Of course, that's just exacerbates the problem, but the World-Herald doesn't seem to mind.

The World-Herald's latest price increase nearly pushed me to cancel my subscription this week. A few weeks ago, they sent me a letter (costing them 50 cents) to inform me that they are increasing the price for this Thursday's paper by $2.75.  Why?  Because of the "valuable advertising" that day.

That's right.  They are charging me extra because Target, Walmart, Best Buy, and Nebraska Furniture Mart are stuffing the Thursday paper full of huge Christmas ads.  Not charging the retailers more...charging me more.  (Of course, let's not forget that the Furniture Mart and the World-Herald are both subsidiaries of Warren Buffet's Berkshire Hathaway.)

That's not my only issue with the business operations of the World-Herald.  I also have leased a parking spot from the World-Herald in their parking garage at 12th & Capitol for over ten years.  Three weeks ago, I received the following letter from the company that manages the garage for the World-Herald:

"This is to inform you that effective November 30, 2013 your contract for parking in a World Herald Garage reserved stall will be cancelled."

I do have the option of signing up for a non-reserved spot (at a slightly reduced rate).  Which is what I did, because I like the convenience of the garage. Why I signed up for a reserved spot is because most of the non-reserved spots are on the roof, where cars are subject to snow, hail, etc.

It appears that the World-Herald made a business decision to sell my spot to Gavilon, a commodity futures company that has just finished a new four-story building on the World-Herald's former headquarters site. Never mind that I've been a loyal customer for over ten years.  Boom...you're cancelled.

I understand the newspaper business has gotten rather cutthroat as of late and that newspapers are struggling financially. But actions like these are not how you show you "appreciate your patronage".  I call it taking advantage of the customers you still have.  It shows a complete lack of respect for their customers, and shows that the World-Herald does not value their customers in the least.

I thought long and hard about taking my business elsewhere, but I'm reluctantly agreeing to their latest terms.

Mostly because the Lincoln Journal-Star doesn't deliver to Omaha.

Sunday, November 24, 2013

UNO Finishes Their Finest Month of Hockey With Sweep of #8 Miami

When UNO's schedule was released, the month of November stood out for it's ferocity.  Road trip to perennial contender Denver.  Home games against Michigan, North Dakota, and Miami.  A really rough stretch for UNO, who was picked by most to finish last in the inaugural season of the NCHC.

That "rough stretch" turned into quite an impressive month:  the Mavs won six of eight games.  And it's not like the other teams fell apart either:  Last week, Michigan was ranked #5 in the nation, Miami #8, and North Dakota #15.  Denver was receiving votes in the top 20.

Now UNO stands poised to break into the rankings themselves.  Quite possibly top 15.  ESPN SportsCenter anchor John Buccigross has UNO a tad bit higher:
Pretty heady stuff, but it's still awfully early.  And it's an awkward stretch for the Mavs with only one weekend series in the next six weeks.  But UNO enters Thanksgiving weekend in first place in the conference. They've settled on a #1 goalie, as Ryan Massa has been rock solid as of late.  The penalty kill, which was horrible in October, has gotten better.

Friday night's game got off on the wrong foot with Miami scoring on a power play goal in the first period to take a 1-0 lead. But the second period turned into one for the ages - at least the first 19 minutes and 30 seconds.  Dominic Zombo scored 22 seconds in to tie it, then Johnnie Searfoss scored a couple minutes later to put UNO in the lead.  Freshman Austin Ortega scored twice along with Brock Montpetit to give UNO a commanding 5-1 lead.  But with 24 seconds left in the period, Miami scored another power play goal, then scored a third goal with just five seconds left to halve the UNO lead.

But UNO was just as dominant in the third period, and the Mavs won 6-3.  I didn't catch the Saturday night game due to the Husker game. UNO won 3-1 thanks to a Tanner Lane short-handed goal.  Massa stopped 25 of 26 shots for his fifth win of the season.

UNO is off for Thanksgiving, then plays Colorado College for the final series before the Christmas break. The Mavs won't play again at home until January 10th against Minnesota-Duluth, who's currently ranked #19.

Saturday, November 23, 2013

Huskers Survive and Advance Against Penn State

As snowflakes and buzzards swirled around State College, Nebraska survived a couple of very questionable late penalty calls and pulled another game out of the fire. It seems no matter what adversity Nebraska faces, the Huskers battle back.  Five freshman turnovers last week, and Nebraska still outplays Michigan State on the rest of the plays. Injuries wreaking havoc once again?  Nebraska battles through.

Third string quarterback. Patchwork offensive line. Receivers named Brandon Reilly and Sam Burtch pressed into service. This team just battles through.  Did they make it tough on themselves with crucial mistakes? Absolutely: Ameer Abdullah fumbles on the goal line when Nebraska seemed ready to take a 14-6 lead.  Ron Kellogg III fumbles inside the NU 10 yard line while being sacked, giving Penn State a short field to take a 13-7 lead.

But say one thing about Nebraska: when the chips are down, they don't give up when the ball bounces the other way. Kenny Bell takes the ensuing kickoff to retake the lead.  But the play of the game had to be that Ameer Abdullah 62 yard touchdown run with that inexplicable personal foul penalty.
Touchdown off the board, and Nebraska has to settle for a game-tying field goal.  Everybody thought it was a bad call.

Well, almost everybody.
Interesting dichotomy from the ESPN team, with the former World-Herald reporter taking issue with the Nebraska media he still works next to.  Or more accurately, the Lincoln Journal-Star.  It reopens the issue of the narrative coming from 13th & Douglas Street in downtown Omaha.  The resentment from 2011 still runs very, very deep.

It's easy to dismiss this game as Nebraska underperforming once again.  That is, if you are being ridiculously superficial.  Nebraska's injury list is almost absurdly long.  Nebraska dipping to their third string at quarterback and on the offensive line.  How bad was it?
Seriously.  In baseball, this is akin to position players having to pitch in extra innings. Except here, it's not strategy that's depleted the bench, it's injuries.  It's either this - playing guys who probably shouldn't be expected to play, or burn redshirts in the eleventh game of the season.  Bo Pelini has wisely decided to keep the redshirts intact. And it's amazing that Nebraska somehow found a way to win this game.  It speaks to the heart and passion in this program.

Of course, others will merely dismiss this as excuse making.  Call it hatred, call it trolling.  Call it myopic.  Bottom line to me is that it makes the discussion of firing Bo Pelini to be downright infuriating. 

Defensively, it wasn't a bad performance, but it wasn't one of Nebraska's better performances. The defensive line got run over at times by Penn State as Zach Zwinak frequenly hit the second and third level untouched.  But the defense did a pretty good job of containing Allen Robinson, though he still got his eight catches and 106 yards.  Props go to Ciante Evans who battled all day with a bum shoulder.
Yeah, Nebraska's first three seasons in the Big Ten haven't gone exactly the way Husker fans had originally hoped. But you can't question the heart and passion of this program. And there's a lot of exciting potential in this program, as Hail Varsity's Brandon Vogel points out:
The 2013 Huskers have their flaws but there are hints of promise here at the end of autumn. If Ameer Abdullah returns, he’s likely to become the first Nebraska back to rush for 1,000-yards in three different seasons. Randy Gregory is going to be even more fun to watch in a year. Same goes for the rest of the defensive line. There are potential all-conference type players at linebacker too. The defensive improvement overall this season is probably one of Pelini’s greatest achievements.
 Am I a Bo-liever?  To me, it's a no-brainer: Why would I not be?

Friday, November 22, 2013

Should Bo Pelini Be Fired?

This isn't a prediction. Nobody knows what Nebraska athletic director Shawn Eichorst is thinking other than Eichorst and probably chancellor Harvey Perlman. Anybody who says they know what Eichorst is planning is probably either (a) guessing or (b) listening to somebody who is guessing.

These are just my opinions on the matter. I don't have any way of knowing whether Eichorst would agree or disagree with them.  He might even have completely different criteria than I'm using.

Two items that probably aren't particularly relevant is how Nebraska performs in the next two games. Sure, a 9-3 record makes it a little difficult to fire Bo Pelini, but Steve Pederson proved that isn't a major obstacle. Likewise, a 7-5 record makes it a little difficult to retain him, but the injuries could be a plausible explanation.

In my mind, any evaluation of Bo Pelini has to be based on Pelini's entire record, but more importantly, where Pelini would take Nebraska football.  Some people characterize Nebraska football as stagnant under Pelini, with four losses each and every year.  I don't see it quite the same.  We've seen seasons with good defense.  We've seen seasons with great defense.  We've seen seasons with awful defense.  And the same thing can be said about the offense.  In the end, it's always averaged out to the same results: 9-4 or 10-4.

Some call it "Bo-gatory".  I'm not sure why people view it so negatively; certainly the Bill Callahan era should give fans reason to appreciate nine wins a season.  That doesn't mean that we should be ecstatic over nine win seasons. We should want more... in fact, we should ask for more.

Many fans want Pelini dismissed because he's failed to get to eleven wins.  "Holding him responsible" is essentially a demand for punishment for failing to meet our goals.

I don't care about punishment. Firing Pelini doesn't make the blowout losses better.

What I care about is the future, and I think good things are in the future.  I believe the defense has turned the corner, and I think there are positives to look at on offense.  Some will accuse me of looking at the situation with Husker rose-colored glasses, so let me explain further.

One of the frequent complaints about Pelini is his recruiting.  Did he make some mistakes in recruiting his first few seasons? Absolutely. Just look at the defensive line recruits. But Pelini made changes in his approach.  Dismissed Ted Gilmore as recruiting coordinator after the 2010 season. He brought in consultants from outside football to evaluate his staff's interviewing and evaluation process. Has it made an effect? Look at the young talent on the defensive line. And for the folks that dig recruiting rankings, note that Nebraska's average star ratings for the 2011 and 2012 classes were higher than anything that Bill Callahan accomplished.

That young talent is why I'm optimistic. Nine freshman on the two deep on the front seven, and they've started to play really well over the last month.  And they'll undoubtedly get better.  Already people are talking about Randy Gregory with Suh-like references.  That's a high standard, and he may not turn out THAT good, but he's got two more seasons of eligibility. 

A lot of people over-simplify Pelini's defense as being good with Callahan's players, but not with his own.  If those critics equate Ndamukong Suh with Callahan players, I suppose.  Sure, Callahan recruited Suh as well as Prince Amukamara and Eric Hagg...but Pelini recruited Alfonzo Dennard, Dejon Gomes, and Lavonte David.

Does Pelini need to change some things? Most definitely, starting with special teams. I don't think Pelini needs to even be told that he needs to do something different. The numbers are pretty glaring. Maybe it's time to lighten the load on linebackers coach/special teams coordinator/recruiting coordinator Ross Els.  Hand the special teams responsibilities to somebody else, at the very least.

I don't believe Pelini to be resistant to change.  He's changed offensive coordinators.  He's changed recruiting coordinators.  When Cory Raymond wasn't working out as secondary coach, he changed that too.  (And for those that think Pelini didn't have his hand in that change, note that Terry Joseph was in Lincoln to fill the opening within a week.)  That being said, Pelini makes changes his way.

There are a lot of youngsters playing this season. On defense, it was because of past recruiting mistakes that now look like they've been corrected.  That seems to be bouncing back nicely.  On offense, it's because of injuries. To think that Nebraska almost won the Big Ten's west division despite losing an all-Big Ten quarterback and an all-American offensive lineman to season ending injuries, as well as several other linemen and skill players over the last month gives you reason to pause.

That youth movement this season gives me a lot of optimism for the next couple of years.  I don't buy that Nebraska is going to be stuck with four losses each season under Pelini, much like I didn't buy that Nebraska was always going to lose to Oklahoma or lose the bowl game under Tom Osborne.  In some respects, the start of the Pelini era at Nebraska has resembled a bit of whack-a-mole. Fix the defense, and the offense stagnates.  Fix the offense, and suddenly the defense tanks.  Now the defense is fixed, but can the offense just become consistent enough to get out of it's own way?  I consider it like a weekend golfer who hasn't put it all together.  When he's driving the ball well, his short game goes to pot.  He figures out the short game, and suddenly he's driving it in the trees.  Can he eventually put both of them together?

My money is on yes. I think Nebraska can easily do worse than Pelini.  Can Nebraska do better than Pelini? Maybe, but it's not as easy as it might seem.  Dan Hawkins looked like a home run hire going from Boise State to Colorado.  Bill Callahan looked pretty good coming to Nebraska just one year after taking Al Davis' franchise to a Super Bowl.  Fear of failing with a new coach shouldn't necessarily stop Nebraska from changing coaches, but it should force Shawn Eichorst to think long and hard before making a change.

Deep down, I do believe it's much more likely that if Pelini and Nebraska separate after this season, it works out better for Pelini down the road than Nebraska.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

B1G Power Poll, Week 13 Ballot

Once again, I'll be ranking the Huskers higher than everybody else.
  1. Ohio State
  2. Wisconsin
  3. Michigan State
  4. Nebraska
  5. Minnesota
  6. Iowa
  7. Michigan
  8. Northwestern
  9. Penn State
  10. Indiana
  11. Illinois
  12. Purdue
Woulda-coulda-shoulda.... but didn't.  That's Nebraska's losses this season.  I still think that deep down, Nebraska is the third best team in the Big Ten this season.  They just haven't played that way.  (That's also why Michigan and Northwestern are also higher than others will vote them.)