Today someone asked me about this new web site called "Omaha Steam" and what the point was. I had to chuckle, because it turns out he was asking about a new UNO athletic department web site called "Omaha's Team". Besides the non-intuitive web address, the web site almost seems to go out of it's way to disassociate itself with the school. The new Miami "O" logo and some subtle background images are the only indication that this is associated with UNO. There's a blank video panel that doesn't tell you anything about what you'll see. Keep looking at the page, and you'll eventually find a mention that it's a UNO web site, apparently geared at selling tickets and encouraging donations. Noble idea, but UNO could have done a better job of associating the site with the school....and no, the "Omaha's Team" slogan doesn't do it. In fact, one could argue that all this slogan does is annoy Creighton fans, which probably doesn't help UNO expand their audience.
Speaking of lame web sites, has anybody figured out the point of "RedOutAroundTheWorld.com"? Originally, I thought it was to fire up fans for the October 16th game against Texas, but when that approach backfired, it seems to be an web site struggling for a purpose. Put another pin on the map? Yeah. Download a wallpaper? Ooooh. Look at pictures of somebody's Aunt Mavis and her Big Red quilt? Oh, baby. Sign me up for spam from the University and the Omaha World-Herald? Please, may I have another? Maybe something else will pop up next month, but somehow I kind of doubt it.
As long as I'm bashing other web sites, both the Lincoln Journal-Star and BigRedNetwork rolled out new designs that I'm not sure fixed much. I do know that both redesigns broke their RSS feeds, so I didn't get any updates from either site for a few days. And DoubleExtraPoint seems to have officially been declared dead on August 30th by GoDaddy.com.
But that bashing is minor compared to what former Nebraska defensive coordinator Craig Bohl fired towards Lawrence, Kansas earlier this week. Last Saturday night, Bohl's North Dakota State squad upset Kansas 6-3, with Turner Gill joining Dan Hawkins as a Big XII coach who lost his first game to a division 1-AA opponent. Bohl added to the insult by stating that he thinks that Northern Iowa's fans will create "more of a hostile environment" this week than Kansas' fans did. Then he fired one back at Gill's team, suggesting that the 1-AA Panthers will be a more physical opponent than the Jayhawks. Ouch.
Truth be told, I'm not completely surprised by Kansas' struggles. Gill's staff has been shuffling players from offense to defense and vice versa, which last month reminded me of "rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic" in my Kansas preseason preview. Kansas had to replace almost all of their offensive stars, and several members of a not-very-good defense. Turner knew what he needed to do when he arrived: "Recruit...recruit...recruit..." That's a long term plan, but it'll take time for that strategy to work. With Lew Perkins out, will Turner have the time to do that?
Back to Bohl, I do have to wonder if there was any residual bad blood from their days together in Lincoln. Steve Sipple of the Journal-Star seemed to dismiss the idea, but deep down, I do have to wonder. Bohl's defense went from pretty good to pretty awful in the matter of a few games, which makes me wonder what all happened at that time. Now it looks even more curious than it did then...
Thursday, September 09, 2010
Monday, September 06, 2010
2010 BlogPoll: Week 2 Draft
Boise State's victory over Virginia Tech tonight could be one of those things that completely blows up the BCS as we know it. Blame sportswriters who demanded that strength of schedule be removed from the formula after Florida State and Nebraska earned BCS title shots ten years ago based on strength of schedule. That has led to teams scheduling down as wins became the only thing that matters.
And now, Boise State may now have the easiest route to the national championship game, thanks to the sportswriters who complained ten years ago. I myself am voting Boise #2 for now, and could easily make a case for them being #1 because they truly have the most impressive win of the season. On my blogpoll ballot, that may not hold as the season progresses. Somebody else will probably have a more impressive victory at some point, but for now, Boise has earned it.
Oregon moves up not so much on the basis of blowing out New Mexico, but rather the general suckage of other teams in the top ten. As score after score went by, you had to stop and say "overrated" over and over...and the problem is, you can't drop somebody without moving somebody else up. Hello Oregon!
I personally think Iowa might be too high at #12 at this point, but again, I wasn't sure who else to move above them. It's early, so that's where they end up. Oklahoma State gets a mention for an impressive victory over Washington State. Missouri loses their spot after Pinkeling things away in the first half against Ron Zook. If this was a straight power poll (which I'd like it to be), Oklahoma would be nowhere on the list, but I'll leave them at the bottom of the top ten for now.
As always, your feedback is welcome. I'm not sure I like how things go after about #15. North Carolina might be penalized too much for losing with so many suspensions, but they might end up being ineligible in the end. Wisconsin might also be penalized too much for their play on the road...
And now, Boise State may now have the easiest route to the national championship game, thanks to the sportswriters who complained ten years ago. I myself am voting Boise #2 for now, and could easily make a case for them being #1 because they truly have the most impressive win of the season. On my blogpoll ballot, that may not hold as the season progresses. Somebody else will probably have a more impressive victory at some point, but for now, Boise has earned it.
Husker Mike's Blasphemy Ballot - Week 2
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -- |
| 2 | Boise St. Broncos |  1 |
| 3 | Ohio St. Buckeyes | 1 |
| 4 | TCU Horned Frogs | 1 |
| 5 | Oregon Ducks | 9 |
| 6 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -- |
| 7 | Texas Longhorns | 1 |
| 8 | Miami Hurricanes | 2 |
| 9 | Florida Gators |  -2 |
| 10 | Oklahoma Sooners | -8 |
| 11 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | 1 |
| 12 | Iowa Hawkeyes | 6 |
| 13 | South Carolina Gamecocks | 8 |
| 14 | USC Trojans | -5 |
| 15 | Penn St. Nittany Lions | -- |
| 16 | Wisconsin Badgers | -3 |
| 17 | Auburn Tigers | -- |
| 18 | North Carolina Tar Heels | -7 |
| 19 | Arkansas Razorbacks | -- |
| 20 | Georgia Bulldogs | -- |
| 21 | Utah Utes | 1 |
| 22 | LSU Tigers | -- |
| 23 | Florida St. Seminoles | 1 |
| 24 | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | 1 |
| 25 | Oklahoma St. Cowboys | -- |
| Dropouts: Missouri Tigers, Houston Cougars | ||
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings »
I personally think Iowa might be too high at #12 at this point, but again, I wasn't sure who else to move above them. It's early, so that's where they end up. Oklahoma State gets a mention for an impressive victory over Washington State. Missouri loses their spot after Pinkeling things away in the first half against Ron Zook. If this was a straight power poll (which I'd like it to be), Oklahoma would be nowhere on the list, but I'll leave them at the bottom of the top ten for now.
As always, your feedback is welcome. I'm not sure I like how things go after about #15. North Carolina might be penalized too much for losing with so many suspensions, but they might end up being ineligible in the end. Wisconsin might also be penalized too much for their play on the road...
Sunday, September 05, 2010
Huskers Top the Hilltoppers
As I watched Taylor Martinez scoot through the Western Kentucky defense like they were a high school junior varsity team, I suddenly realized where I saw this script before. Nebraska goes into a game not sure who the starting quarterback against an overmatched opponent, and the starter puts some impressive stats on the scoresheet, but looked awkward at times.
That was Jammal Lord against McNeese State in 2002. I remember watching one play where Lord failed to see a wide open receiver and instead scrambled 50 yards for a touchdown. I thought it was a bad decision and hoped that Frank Solich would pull him and put either Mike Stuntz or Curt Dukes into the game. But after the game, all people could talk about was the unbelievable play of Lord.
Fast forward eight years and Martinez's debut against the Hilltoppers. Several times tonight, we saw what Martinez can do with his feet. He finds holes, he makes guys miss. And then when someone finally does get their hands on Martinez, he usually breaks the tackle. 7 carries for 127 yards in his first collegiate action? Very impressive indeed.
But less impressive in my mind was his play in the second quarter. Three straight drives with punts, including two three-and-outs against one of the worst teams in division 1-A? Remember, this is an opponent who hasn't won a game since 2008. Several of Martinez's throws in the second quarter weren't even close to a receiver, as he attempted to throw downfield. Earlier in the game and later in the game, Martinez seemed to be limited to shorter screens and dumpoff passes. A good strategy to give the inexperienced freshman some confidence, to be sure...especially against an outmanned opponent. But Nebraska will need more ... much more the rest of the season.
It was a limited game plan tonight. Five carries for Roy Helu and Rex Burkhead each? Again, it worked tonight, but that's not going to be a winning strategy down the line. Niles Paul showed some nifty moves, but then had yet another turnover. Brandon Kinnie showed solid hands and made some really sweet catches. And frankly, Cody Green impressed me with his arm tonight, going 5 for 6 and showing some nice poise.
I don't think Martinez played badly, but I wasn't as wowed as others are. I'd just like to have seen a more consistent performance from him with his arm. Shawn Watson told the Journal-Star that he'd give Martinez an "A+". I hope that was grading on the curve, or perhaps more accurately, grading him on the fact that it was his first game since high school.
Defensively, I liked what Baker Steinkuhler did replacing Ndamukong Suh tonight. Jared Crick also had an impressive sack of WKU's Kawaun Jakes. However, it seemed the defense lost something on that play when Cameron Meredith suffered an apparent shoulder stinger which ended his night. Lavonte David was all over the field, leading the Huskers in tackles. Alonzo Whaley seemed to have an inconsistent performance. The Huskers seemed to struggle with WKU's Bobby Rainey who totaled 191 yards on 33 touches tonight. The Huskers struggled to get much pressure on Jakes, save for Steinkuhler who forced the awkward throw that P.J. Smith picked off. Props to Dejon Gomes who had another touchdown saving strip. I don't know if Gomes playing safety makes Nebraska more vulnerable to the run, but he's a guy you want on the field in coverage.
It could be far worse for Nebraska. The Huskers could have narrowly escaped Utah State like the Sooners did. They could have lost to a 1-AA team like 'Ole Miss did. So I'll take a 48-10 victory, flaws in all.
That was Jammal Lord against McNeese State in 2002. I remember watching one play where Lord failed to see a wide open receiver and instead scrambled 50 yards for a touchdown. I thought it was a bad decision and hoped that Frank Solich would pull him and put either Mike Stuntz or Curt Dukes into the game. But after the game, all people could talk about was the unbelievable play of Lord.
Fast forward eight years and Martinez's debut against the Hilltoppers. Several times tonight, we saw what Martinez can do with his feet. He finds holes, he makes guys miss. And then when someone finally does get their hands on Martinez, he usually breaks the tackle. 7 carries for 127 yards in his first collegiate action? Very impressive indeed.
But less impressive in my mind was his play in the second quarter. Three straight drives with punts, including two three-and-outs against one of the worst teams in division 1-A? Remember, this is an opponent who hasn't won a game since 2008. Several of Martinez's throws in the second quarter weren't even close to a receiver, as he attempted to throw downfield. Earlier in the game and later in the game, Martinez seemed to be limited to shorter screens and dumpoff passes. A good strategy to give the inexperienced freshman some confidence, to be sure...especially against an outmanned opponent. But Nebraska will need more ... much more the rest of the season.
It was a limited game plan tonight. Five carries for Roy Helu and Rex Burkhead each? Again, it worked tonight, but that's not going to be a winning strategy down the line. Niles Paul showed some nifty moves, but then had yet another turnover. Brandon Kinnie showed solid hands and made some really sweet catches. And frankly, Cody Green impressed me with his arm tonight, going 5 for 6 and showing some nice poise.
I don't think Martinez played badly, but I wasn't as wowed as others are. I'd just like to have seen a more consistent performance from him with his arm. Shawn Watson told the Journal-Star that he'd give Martinez an "A+". I hope that was grading on the curve, or perhaps more accurately, grading him on the fact that it was his first game since high school.
Defensively, I liked what Baker Steinkuhler did replacing Ndamukong Suh tonight. Jared Crick also had an impressive sack of WKU's Kawaun Jakes. However, it seemed the defense lost something on that play when Cameron Meredith suffered an apparent shoulder stinger which ended his night. Lavonte David was all over the field, leading the Huskers in tackles. Alonzo Whaley seemed to have an inconsistent performance. The Huskers seemed to struggle with WKU's Bobby Rainey who totaled 191 yards on 33 touches tonight. The Huskers struggled to get much pressure on Jakes, save for Steinkuhler who forced the awkward throw that P.J. Smith picked off. Props to Dejon Gomes who had another touchdown saving strip. I don't know if Gomes playing safety makes Nebraska more vulnerable to the run, but he's a guy you want on the field in coverage.
It could be far worse for Nebraska. The Huskers could have narrowly escaped Utah State like the Sooners did. They could have lost to a 1-AA team like 'Ole Miss did. So I'll take a 48-10 victory, flaws in all.
Saturday, September 04, 2010
Husker Mike's Post Game Western Kentucky Podcast
Postgame comments from Memorial Stadium after Taylor Martinez wowed fans with his legs.
Thursday, September 02, 2010
Predictions for the 2010 Husker Football Season
First my thoughts on some of the open personnel battles:
So that's a 11-2 Husker team who will likely get a BCS bowl berth (probably in the Fiesta Bowl), at least according to my crystal ball. What's your prediction?
- At left tackle, I'm leaning towards Jeremiah Sirles over Jermarcus Hardrick. Call it a gut call here, but I would have figured Hardrick would have claimed this spot by now otherwise.
- At wide receiver, I think that freshman Quincy Enunwa and senior Will Henry will be the receivers to watch off the bench. That being said, Niles Paul, Brandon Kinnie, and Mike McNeill ideally will take most of the snaps.
- At linebacker, I think Lavonte David earned a starting job a couple of weeks ago. My gut feel suggested that perhaps Eric Martin might have been close to edging out Will Compton on the field. Now that Compton is out for a while, that's probably a no-brainer at this point.
- I still don't know what to think at safety. My best bet is P.J. Smith and Anthony West, but that's a wild guess.
- Oh, and that quarterback thing. I'd like to say Zac Lee, but the buzz around Taylor Martinez is just getting too strong. Only one thing is for sure to me, as I don't think we'll truly know who'll start until after kickoff. If you aren't going to name a starter at this point, there's no point in making a formal announcement at all.
- Does anybody really think Nebraska will lose to Western Kentucky, Idaho, or South Dakota State? Didn't think so.
- As for Washington, I think they are better than I thought last spring...but not as good as others think. I think Nebraska stands a 70% chance of winning this one. For all the hype about Washington's offense, remember that the Huskies only averaged 1 more point a game (26.1) than the Huskers woeful offense (25.1) in 2009.
- Kansas State may have Daniel Thomas and a solid offensive line, but they've got a few questions to answer at receiver. Again, I think this is a game Nebraska should win, even though it's on the road. I give the Huskers a 75% chance of victory in this game.
- Texas? Well, the Huskers were :01 away from victory in Dallas last year. Nebraska loses Suh, yes...but Texas lost McCoy and Shipley. I still believe Nebraska's offense will be much better than last year, and this game is in Lincoln. My prediction: 55% chance of a Husker win.
- Oklahoma State has to break in a new quarterback and a new offensive coordinator, and replace too much on defense. But this one is a trap game, on the road between the Texas and Missouri games. 60% chance of a Husker victory.
- It's a good thing that Missouri charters their transportation to the game, because the way things are going, very few Tigers will still have a driver's license by the time they need to get to Lincoln. Seriously, Missouri needs to find a playmaker on offense now that Danario Alexander is gone. Blaine Gabbert at times last season could just fling it towards #81 and Alexander would almost always make a big play. My prediction: 65% chance of a Husker victory.
- Iowa State? I love Paul Rhodes...but the Huskers want those eight turnovers back. 85% chance of a Husker victory.
- Kansas has too many holes to fill in 2010. 90% chance of a Husker victory.
- Texas A&M? Mike Sherman. 70% chance of a Husker victory.
- Colorado? Dan Hawkins. 95% chance of a Husker victory.
So that's a 11-2 Husker team who will likely get a BCS bowl berth (probably in the Fiesta Bowl), at least according to my crystal ball. What's your prediction?
Wednesday, September 01, 2010
Nebraska's 2011 Schedule Is "Made For TV"
Here's the question for Husker fans... did the Big Ten conference set the 2011 conference schedule, or did ESPN do it? My goodness, but the Huskers got set up with every heavyweight that the Big Ten conference has to offer. Wisconsin, Ohio State, Penn State, Michigan, and Iowa in one season? This is somewhat akin to what happens to Iowa State two out of every four years, where they have to play both Oklahoma AND Texas in the same season.
Let's compare the original Big XII schedule and the revised Big Ten schedules for 2011.
I see the Texas/Ohio State swap as essentially a wash, though the Texas game would have been in Austin. Both squads have competed for a national championship in recent years, though admittedly Ohio State didn't deserve to be there in 2008.Maybe that should be a slight edge in strength to the Big XII. Swapping Wisconsin for Kansas State is clearly a major increase in schedule strength. Oklahoma State and Missouri are clearly stronger programs than Minnesota and Michigan State, so those two are the main advantages of the Big XII schedule. Penn State is clearly a stronger program than Kansas in football, so that's a huge increase in schedule strength. Iowa/Colorado is not even a fair comparison. A&M/Michigan is one of those comparisons that's tough to make; neither school is playing all that well right now, but each is hoping. Historically, Michigan is a much tougher team than Texas A&M.
Another way of looking at it is that Nebraska's Big Ten schedule has four teams in the AP Top 20 this season, compared to only one Top 20 team on the old Big XII schedule. With that in mind, plus non-conference games against Washington, Fresno State, and Wyoming, nobody will criticize if the Huskers schedule a 1-AA team to come to Lincoln for Labor Day weekend.
One thing is clear to me is that the Big Ten wanted to match Nebraska up against the big names of the Big Ten for television early on, if only to improve their bargaining position as they renegotiate the contract with ABC/ESPN. You have to figure that at least half of Nebraska's games are likely to be televised on ABC next season (Washington, at Wisconsin, Ohio State [ABC PrimeTime], at Penn State, at Michigan, Iowa).
You might think that Nebraska's schedule would ease up in 2013 when Ohio State and Wisconsin drop off, replaced by Purdue, Illinois, or Indiana...except that further Big Ten expansion is likely. (Maybe Missouri gets invited when the Big XII inevitably collapses.) So it could be a while before we see the Hoosiers in Lincoln for a football game, and that's why this schedule was set. Get these new marquee matchups on TV now, rather than take a chance that these matchups might be further delayed down the line.
Let's compare the original Big XII schedule and the revised Big Ten schedules for 2011.
| Big XII 2011 Schedule | Big Ten 2011 Schedule | Advantage |
| Kansas State | at Wisconsin | Big Ten |
| at Texas | Ohio State | Push |
| Oklahoma State | at Minnesota | Big XII |
| at Missouri | Michigan State | Big XII |
| Iowa State | Northwestern | Big Ten |
| at Kansas | at Penn State | Big Ten |
| Texas A&M | at Michigan | Push for now |
| at Colorado | Iowa | Big Ten |
Another way of looking at it is that Nebraska's Big Ten schedule has four teams in the AP Top 20 this season, compared to only one Top 20 team on the old Big XII schedule. With that in mind, plus non-conference games against Washington, Fresno State, and Wyoming, nobody will criticize if the Huskers schedule a 1-AA team to come to Lincoln for Labor Day weekend.
One thing is clear to me is that the Big Ten wanted to match Nebraska up against the big names of the Big Ten for television early on, if only to improve their bargaining position as they renegotiate the contract with ABC/ESPN. You have to figure that at least half of Nebraska's games are likely to be televised on ABC next season (Washington, at Wisconsin, Ohio State [ABC PrimeTime], at Penn State, at Michigan, Iowa).
You might think that Nebraska's schedule would ease up in 2013 when Ohio State and Wisconsin drop off, replaced by Purdue, Illinois, or Indiana...except that further Big Ten expansion is likely. (Maybe Missouri gets invited when the Big XII inevitably collapses.) So it could be a while before we see the Hoosiers in Lincoln for a football game, and that's why this schedule was set. Get these new marquee matchups on TV now, rather than take a chance that these matchups might be further delayed down the line.
Monday, August 30, 2010
Monday Night Beer: Husker QB Debate and UNO Arena Problems
For what it's worth, I still think Zac Lee trots on the field at quarterback for Nebraska's opening possession on Saturday night against Western Kentucky. I do admit that I don't blame Lee that much for the struggles of the offense last year; injuries and poor play by the receivers still are the responsible parties from my perspective. That being said, I do expect to see all three quarterbacks. The first one to see the field will be Taylor Martinez, in my opinion, and likely in non-traditional roles. The more I think about it, I think Martinez could be used like Florida used Tim Tebow as a freshman.
No, I'm not saying Martinez is Tebow-like; I'm merely suggesting his role could be similar to Tebow as a freshman. Come in for specific plays in the middle of drives to throw a new wrinkle into the offense. Maybe not even line up at quarterback, but perhaps elsewhere on the field to take advantage of his athletic ability. Lee could be like Chris Leak, the starting quarterback who's skills don't exactly fit what Nebraska now wants to do on offense, but still doing enough to be effective. In any event, may the best quarterback emerge.
I'll be posting my season prediction either here or at Corn Nation later this week, but let me throw one little bit out there tonight: I'm feeling pretty optimistic about the Huskers this season.
The rumor mill coming out from UNO is not sounding very good about the proposed arena near Aksarben at Chili Greens. Namely, UNO may be seriously considering building a 7,000 seat arena as they don't feel a larger arena is viable. The devil is in the details, of course, but my initial thoughts it that if a 7,000 seat arena is all that UNO can afford to build now, they should simply shelve the project for two or three years. Last season, UNO averaged nearly 6800 fans, which leaves almost no room for UNO to grow as a program.
I understand ... and I still agree with many of the reasons for UNO to build it's own arena, but I also don't believe that UNO has really tapped into what it's potential is. We're just one year into the Dean Blais era and preparing for a switch in conferences. Expectations seem to be increasing everywhere around the program, which makes it puzzling that you'd spend millions of dollars to entrench the program where it is from an attendance perspective.
Instead, I'd suggest that UNO let Dean Blais and his program develop for two or three more years, and see where things go. Then revisit the whole question at that time. If UNO really is still only drawing 7000 fans, then go ahead and do it. But if UNO has progressed as a program to where they are drawing much more than that, it would be a shame to slam the door on that progress because UNO built an arena that became obsolete during construction.
One of the things that we learned during Trev Alberts first year on the job is that we really don't know what UNO is capable of, and that the days of saying UNO can't do something are over.
And frankly, I don't believe that UNO is only capable of a 7000 seat arena.
No, I'm not saying Martinez is Tebow-like; I'm merely suggesting his role could be similar to Tebow as a freshman. Come in for specific plays in the middle of drives to throw a new wrinkle into the offense. Maybe not even line up at quarterback, but perhaps elsewhere on the field to take advantage of his athletic ability. Lee could be like Chris Leak, the starting quarterback who's skills don't exactly fit what Nebraska now wants to do on offense, but still doing enough to be effective. In any event, may the best quarterback emerge.
I'll be posting my season prediction either here or at Corn Nation later this week, but let me throw one little bit out there tonight: I'm feeling pretty optimistic about the Huskers this season.
The rumor mill coming out from UNO is not sounding very good about the proposed arena near Aksarben at Chili Greens. Namely, UNO may be seriously considering building a 7,000 seat arena as they don't feel a larger arena is viable. The devil is in the details, of course, but my initial thoughts it that if a 7,000 seat arena is all that UNO can afford to build now, they should simply shelve the project for two or three years. Last season, UNO averaged nearly 6800 fans, which leaves almost no room for UNO to grow as a program.
I understand ... and I still agree with many of the reasons for UNO to build it's own arena, but I also don't believe that UNO has really tapped into what it's potential is. We're just one year into the Dean Blais era and preparing for a switch in conferences. Expectations seem to be increasing everywhere around the program, which makes it puzzling that you'd spend millions of dollars to entrench the program where it is from an attendance perspective.
Instead, I'd suggest that UNO let Dean Blais and his program develop for two or three more years, and see where things go. Then revisit the whole question at that time. If UNO really is still only drawing 7000 fans, then go ahead and do it. But if UNO has progressed as a program to where they are drawing much more than that, it would be a shame to slam the door on that progress because UNO built an arena that became obsolete during construction.
One of the things that we learned during Trev Alberts first year on the job is that we really don't know what UNO is capable of, and that the days of saying UNO can't do something are over.
And frankly, I don't believe that UNO is only capable of a 7000 seat arena.
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Lee Barfknecht Says NU/UT at 2:30 pm; I say "Not So Fast!"
Sources suggest that a 2:30 pm kickoff time is the most likely scenario for the Nebraska/Texas football game, according to Lee Barfknecht of the Omaha World-Herald. But while I don't completely dismiss a 2:30 pm kickoff, I tend to lean against it, unless Nebraska loses to Washington or Kansas State.
Barfknecht's sources admit that ABC hasn't given any indication that they will be opening an 11 am kickoff window for October 16th, but you can read that both ways. ABC is leaving their options open, and likely won't make any decision until October...maybe not even until the Kansas State game.
Furthermore, according to the Big XII conference, "ESPN sublicenses six games from FSN, dates may be flexible and times are tentative." Three ESPN games are already set: SMU at Texas Tech on Sunday, September 5 and two Thursday night games, Texas A&M at Oklahoma State on September 30 and Nebraska at Kansas State on October 7. All other dates are labeled "tentative": October 30th at 8:15 pm, November 6th at 6 pm, and November 20th at 6 pm.
But some of those dates don't have particularly compelling games that would be attractive for ESPN/ABC. October 30th has Nebraska-Missouri, A&M-Tech, Oklahoma-Colorado, Iowa State-Kansas, Kansas State-Oklahoma State, and Texas-Baylor. (NU/MU and A&M/TT look like the likely candidates for ABC and ESPN broadcasts.) November 6th has Nebraska-Iowa State, Kansas State-Texas, Oklahoma State-Baylor, Texas A&M-Oklahoma, Texas Tech-Missouri, and Kansas-Colorado. (A&M/OU and TT/MU look like the most likely candidates.) November 20th has Nebraska-Texas A&M, Texas Tech-Weber State, Kansas-Oklahoma State, Colorado-Kansas State, Iowa State-Missouri, Oklahoma-Baylor, and Texas-Florida Atlantic. (After NU/A&M, none look too big on the 20th.)
These dates are just placeholders, and ESPN will move them if a matchup looks more compelling as the game approaches. Especially that November 20th window. I do wonder if ESPN isn't eyeing Missouri at Nebraska for that October 30th 8:15 pm window. (Uggh. I hate 8:15 kickoffs.)
I don't believe ABC wants to televise Texas at Nebraska at 2:30 pm. ABC has already scheduled Iowa at Michigan for 2:30 pm as part of the regional broadcast. With Nebraska's move to the Big Ten, there will be more interest in Big Ten country to see the Huskers, and they won't want this game on pay-per-view in Big Ten country if Nebraska and Texas are undefeated.
I still think it'll be a morning kickoff on ABC or an evening kickoff on ESPN, when all is said and done, if Nebraska is undefeated when Texas comes to town.
Barfknecht's sources admit that ABC hasn't given any indication that they will be opening an 11 am kickoff window for October 16th, but you can read that both ways. ABC is leaving their options open, and likely won't make any decision until October...maybe not even until the Kansas State game.
Furthermore, according to the Big XII conference, "ESPN sublicenses six games from FSN, dates may be flexible and times are tentative." Three ESPN games are already set: SMU at Texas Tech on Sunday, September 5 and two Thursday night games, Texas A&M at Oklahoma State on September 30 and Nebraska at Kansas State on October 7. All other dates are labeled "tentative": October 30th at 8:15 pm, November 6th at 6 pm, and November 20th at 6 pm.
But some of those dates don't have particularly compelling games that would be attractive for ESPN/ABC. October 30th has Nebraska-Missouri, A&M-Tech, Oklahoma-Colorado, Iowa State-Kansas, Kansas State-Oklahoma State, and Texas-Baylor. (NU/MU and A&M/TT look like the likely candidates for ABC and ESPN broadcasts.) November 6th has Nebraska-Iowa State, Kansas State-Texas, Oklahoma State-Baylor, Texas A&M-Oklahoma, Texas Tech-Missouri, and Kansas-Colorado. (A&M/OU and TT/MU look like the most likely candidates.) November 20th has Nebraska-Texas A&M, Texas Tech-Weber State, Kansas-Oklahoma State, Colorado-Kansas State, Iowa State-Missouri, Oklahoma-Baylor, and Texas-Florida Atlantic. (After NU/A&M, none look too big on the 20th.)
These dates are just placeholders, and ESPN will move them if a matchup looks more compelling as the game approaches. Especially that November 20th window. I do wonder if ESPN isn't eyeing Missouri at Nebraska for that October 30th 8:15 pm window. (Uggh. I hate 8:15 kickoffs.)
I don't believe ABC wants to televise Texas at Nebraska at 2:30 pm. ABC has already scheduled Iowa at Michigan for 2:30 pm as part of the regional broadcast. With Nebraska's move to the Big Ten, there will be more interest in Big Ten country to see the Huskers, and they won't want this game on pay-per-view in Big Ten country if Nebraska and Texas are undefeated.
I still think it'll be a morning kickoff on ABC or an evening kickoff on ESPN, when all is said and done, if Nebraska is undefeated when Texas comes to town.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Twitter Turning Some Fans Into Twits
I've been using Twitter for a couple of years now, but I'm not sure I use it the same way many folks do. I only follow 81 people currently. Some are friends, some are members of the media, and others are just things I find informative. I don't follow a large number of people because I simply don't want to wade through hundreds (or thousands) of tweets each day. I don't follow celebrities at all, other than a couple of Husker coaches. For the most part, I haven't found a celebrity tweet that I've found particularly interesting. I could care less what Ashton Kutcher has to say, and furthermore, I know that with one million or so followers, there never could possibly be a conversation anyway. So why bother?
Today, much of the Husker Twittersphere was focused on a Tweet from @TaylorMartinez3 that stated that "Dreams Come True When You Work Hard and Pray! T-magic". When I first saw it, my first thought was that this was a fake...especially after he decided to follow Tom Shatel yesterday. Not sure why an 18 year old redshirt freshman would open up a Twitter account and start following the news media...especially when the Twitter account appears to be tied to a similar Facebook account that looks more like a amateur celebrity fan page than the Facebook account for a college student...especially when the Facebook account has no updates older than May of this year.
Sometime this evening, the Twitter account is gone; all the Tweets have disappeared without a trace. If it's the real Taylor Martinez, perhaps someone in the athletic department encouraged him to take it down. Or more likely, the originator of the hoax got freaked out by the attention today and yanked it down before it got traced any further. At least I'm hoping it's a hoax; it would be concerning if a redshirt freshman who's never played a down of college football was going around promoting himself as "T-magic"
Some of these hoax Twitter accounts can be rather entertaining. Have you checked out FakeTomOsborne, FakeJimDelany, or FakeDanBeebe? For the most part, they are a heck of a lot more entertaining than the real celebrities. Other than Bo Pelini's joke about the flu last October or the Go Karts tweet this week, he doesn't have much to offer. Heck, I've already dropped ChipBrownOB now that realignment talk has died down and I don't really care what misinformation he has to offer. (I still follow FrankTheTank, who proved to be the far more reliable source on realignment.) But when Big Mister Suh tweets about Subway sandwiches, well, that's a sign that I probably won't miss anything by not following.
Am I missing something with Twitter? Or how do you handle following 3000 or more people on Twitter?
Today, much of the Husker Twittersphere was focused on a Tweet from @TaylorMartinez3 that stated that "Dreams Come True When You Work Hard and Pray! T-magic". When I first saw it, my first thought was that this was a fake...especially after he decided to follow Tom Shatel yesterday. Not sure why an 18 year old redshirt freshman would open up a Twitter account and start following the news media...especially when the Twitter account appears to be tied to a similar Facebook account that looks more like a amateur celebrity fan page than the Facebook account for a college student...especially when the Facebook account has no updates older than May of this year.
Sometime this evening, the Twitter account is gone; all the Tweets have disappeared without a trace. If it's the real Taylor Martinez, perhaps someone in the athletic department encouraged him to take it down. Or more likely, the originator of the hoax got freaked out by the attention today and yanked it down before it got traced any further. At least I'm hoping it's a hoax; it would be concerning if a redshirt freshman who's never played a down of college football was going around promoting himself as "T-magic"
Some of these hoax Twitter accounts can be rather entertaining. Have you checked out FakeTomOsborne, FakeJimDelany, or FakeDanBeebe? For the most part, they are a heck of a lot more entertaining than the real celebrities. Other than Bo Pelini's joke about the flu last October or the Go Karts tweet this week, he doesn't have much to offer. Heck, I've already dropped ChipBrownOB now that realignment talk has died down and I don't really care what misinformation he has to offer. (I still follow FrankTheTank, who proved to be the far more reliable source on realignment.) But when Big Mister Suh tweets about Subway sandwiches, well, that's a sign that I probably won't miss anything by not following.
Am I missing something with Twitter? Or how do you handle following 3000 or more people on Twitter?
Sunday, August 22, 2010
Huskers #8 in the Preseason AP Poll: Just Right, Too High, or "Ridiculous"
I have to say I'm not surprised that Nebraska starts the season ranked eighth in the AP writers poll. Not sure I agree with it, but it's in line with what others have been saying all preseason. I'm still keeping the Huskers at 12th on my preseason BlogPoll unless someone can talk me into moving them up or down.
Yesterday, on the CBS Preseason Football Preview special, Gary Danielsen gave his picks for the BCS title game, announcing it as "two Big Ten teams": Ohio State vs. Nebraska. (Still not completely used to that idea yet...) As you might expect, that got quite a response from AJ the HuskerH8er on Twitter:
Premature? Yes. Excessive? Perhaps. Ridiculous? Not really... in fact, I'd argue that AJ's probably in a very small minority in the college football world on this one. (Remember he's predicting 7-5 for Nebraska in 2010...) Which brough about another response:
Last year, a team started the season ranked fifth in the country with a quarterback who had only thrown 20 passes in his career, with two touchdowns and one interception. But hey, why let a little facts get in the way of a good Sam Keller reference. (Though truth be told, if I were a Missouri fan, I'd want to relieve 2007 over and over and over again as well...)
But speaking of quarterback play, Steve Sipple reported today that the buzz he's hearing suggests that Taylor Martinez is having a strong preseason practice and could very well be the starting quarterback for the Western Kentucky game. I think I still give the edge to Zac Lee early in the season, but I anticipate Martinez getting some playing time early and often, and making a strong bid to take over the starting job as the season evolves. Maybe it happens earlier than I expect.
In any event, people are putting too much emphasis on the quarterback question. As long as the offensive line continues to develop (and doesn't encounter any more season-ending injuries), I think the Husker offense will be fine in 2010. Not 1983 or 1995 dominant, but simply average. I think the Husker defense will be strong enough to put Nebraska in position to win every game in 2010...and that's going to be good enough to put them in position to make their case in December and January.
Yesterday, on the CBS Preseason Football Preview special, Gary Danielsen gave his picks for the BCS title game, announcing it as "two Big Ten teams": Ohio State vs. Nebraska. (Still not completely used to that idea yet...) As you might expect, that got quite a response from AJ the HuskerH8er on Twitter:
you don't find these ridiculous expectations at least a tiny bit concerning?
most 8th ranked teams have at leastsome sort of QB option to justify it. Maybe a pac10 xfer will come save u?
But speaking of quarterback play, Steve Sipple reported today that the buzz he's hearing suggests that Taylor Martinez is having a strong preseason practice and could very well be the starting quarterback for the Western Kentucky game. I think I still give the edge to Zac Lee early in the season, but I anticipate Martinez getting some playing time early and often, and making a strong bid to take over the starting job as the season evolves. Maybe it happens earlier than I expect.
In any event, people are putting too much emphasis on the quarterback question. As long as the offensive line continues to develop (and doesn't encounter any more season-ending injuries), I think the Husker offense will be fine in 2010. Not 1983 or 1995 dominant, but simply average. I think the Husker defense will be strong enough to put Nebraska in position to win every game in 2010...and that's going to be good enough to put them in position to make their case in December and January.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Preseason BlogPoll Ballot Draft
Let me start off by saying I hate preseason polls. It's all a bunch of guesswork based on what you think teams have coming back and how it translates to this season...or in other words, it's a big wild-ass guess. Which is fine, except that these preseason rankings have a way of becoming entrenched. If teams win, but they don't look as good as you thought they would be, you'd think that pollsters would move them down...but many voters don't feel you can drop someone unless they lose.
I'm a big believer in a "power poll", and that the rankings should be based by how strong you think a team is. Last year, I caught all sorts of grief by keeping Oklahoma up there in the rankings even though they lost several squeakers in September and October. (I think the number of Sooners that were selected in the NFL Draft validates just how good the Sooners probably were, even if their won-loss record didn't reflect it.) But the problem with a "power poll" is that you have absolutely zippo to base your preseason rankings on.
So what to do? Well, take your best shot and rank the teams as you think, knowing full well that you are guessing. Any issues will eventually work their way out, as real results will quickly overwhelm these preseason guesses.
So after throwing down these guesses, where am I out of line? Who is too high? Who'd I forget?
I'm a big believer in a "power poll", and that the rankings should be based by how strong you think a team is. Last year, I caught all sorts of grief by keeping Oklahoma up there in the rankings even though they lost several squeakers in September and October. (I think the number of Sooners that were selected in the NFL Draft validates just how good the Sooners probably were, even if their won-loss record didn't reflect it.) But the problem with a "power poll" is that you have absolutely zippo to base your preseason rankings on.
So what to do? Well, take your best shot and rank the teams as you think, knowing full well that you are guessing. Any issues will eventually work their way out, as real results will quickly overwhelm these preseason guesses.
Husker Mike's Blasphemy Ballot - Week 1
| Rank | Team | Delta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alabama Crimson Tide | -- |
| 2 | Oklahoma Sooners | -- |
| 3 | Boise St. Broncos | -- |
| 4 | Ohio St. Buckeyes | -- |
| 5 | TCU Horned Frogs | -- |
| 6 | Virginia Tech Hokies | -- |
| 7 | Florida Gators | -- |
| 8 | Texas Longhorns | -- |
| 9 | USC Trojans | -- |
| 10 | Miami Hurricanes | -- |
| 11 | North Carolina Tar Heels | -- |
| 12 | Nebraska Cornhuskers | -- |
| 13 | Wisconsin Badgers | -- |
| 14 | Oregon Ducks | -- |
| 15 | Penn St. Nittany Lions | -- |
| 16 | Missouri Tigers | -- |
| 17 | Auburn Tigers | -- |
| 18 | Iowa Hawkeyes | -- |
| 19 | Arkansas Razorbacks | -- |
| 20 | Georgia Bulldogs | -- |
| 21 | South Carolina Gamecocks | -- |
| 22 | Utah Utes | -- |
| 23 | Houston Cougars | -- |
| 24 | Florida St. Seminoles | -- |
| 25 | Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets | -- |
SB Nation BlogPoll College Football Top 25 Rankings »
So after throwing down these guesses, where am I out of line? Who is too high? Who'd I forget?
Monday, August 16, 2010
Monday Night Beer: Nebraska Just Loves a Good Quarterback Rumor
'Twas a busy weekend for myself this weekend, attempting to build a new playset for the kids. Attempting being the operative word, as I long blew past the estimated "7-9 hours" of assembly time. I guestimate it's about 2/3rds done after 14 hours of work.
I don't think I missed a whole lot this weekend though, as some people obsessed about the Taylor Martinez situation. About all we know at this point is that Martinez missed a practice, apparently with Bo Pelini's knowledge. Is there something more to this? Perhaps. Is it any of our business? Unlikely. In this situation, fans start recalling Harrison Beck and Eric Crouch, and start assuming "here we go again." whether it's even remotely a similar situation. Heck, fans still criticize Crouch for going back to talk to Fred Petito, his high school coach...even though he never even missed a practice.
Speaking of players transferring, looks like Nebraska is catching former Washington tight end Kavario Middleton, who was dismissed by coach Steve Sarkisian last month for off-the-field issues. Middleton will have to grow up pretty darn fast and live by the rules Pelini lays down; if he doesn't, Middleton probably won't have a third chance to play college football at the 1-A level.
Spending the weekend outside with the power tools meant that I didn't get a chance to watch much of the PGA Championship this weekend. In fact, I didn't even know about the controversy until late last evening. Good thing for sports talk though; if Dustin Johnson hadn't handed the media this story line, they would have had to revert back to the old tired "nobody cares about golf unless Tiger Woods is in contention" storyline.
Friday night, I did get a chance to walk across the new Bob Kerrey bridge for the first time; it was a nice evening for a stroll along the river. But what struck me was the walk back into Omaha and seeing TD Ameritrade Park emerging as you reach the peak. This will be the new "money shot" ESPN uses during next year's College World Series.
Speaking of ballparks, did anybody catch former Jay Leno writer Brad Dickson's quip yesterday about the new ballpark at BFE?
I had to chuckle this morning at deposed Husker Information Minister Jim Rose's veiled reference to Bill Callahan this morning as he criticized USC coach Lane Kiffin's reference to a bowl game as just another game. This from the man who did his darndest to sell us what Callahan and Steve Pederson were trying to shove down the throats of Husker fans. So did Rose finally realize he was wrong before? Hardly. He's just got his schtick down where he'll say anything and everything that he thinks people want to hear. Four years ago, it was pumping Callahan and Pederson's clusterfool. Now relegated to being the sidekick on KFAB's morning show, he's reduced to making outrageous statements about Omaha's police and fire unions.
I don't think I missed a whole lot this weekend though, as some people obsessed about the Taylor Martinez situation. About all we know at this point is that Martinez missed a practice, apparently with Bo Pelini's knowledge. Is there something more to this? Perhaps. Is it any of our business? Unlikely. In this situation, fans start recalling Harrison Beck and Eric Crouch, and start assuming "here we go again." whether it's even remotely a similar situation. Heck, fans still criticize Crouch for going back to talk to Fred Petito, his high school coach...even though he never even missed a practice.
Speaking of players transferring, looks like Nebraska is catching former Washington tight end Kavario Middleton, who was dismissed by coach Steve Sarkisian last month for off-the-field issues. Middleton will have to grow up pretty darn fast and live by the rules Pelini lays down; if he doesn't, Middleton probably won't have a third chance to play college football at the 1-A level.
Spending the weekend outside with the power tools meant that I didn't get a chance to watch much of the PGA Championship this weekend. In fact, I didn't even know about the controversy until late last evening. Good thing for sports talk though; if Dustin Johnson hadn't handed the media this story line, they would have had to revert back to the old tired "nobody cares about golf unless Tiger Woods is in contention" storyline.
Friday night, I did get a chance to walk across the new Bob Kerrey bridge for the first time; it was a nice evening for a stroll along the river. But what struck me was the walk back into Omaha and seeing TD Ameritrade Park emerging as you reach the peak. This will be the new "money shot" ESPN uses during next year's College World Series.
Speaking of ballparks, did anybody catch former Jay Leno writer Brad Dickson's quip yesterday about the new ballpark at BFE?
The Omaha Royals held “Star Wars” Night. I heard the Royals were paying tribute to “A galaxy, far, far away” and assumed they meant Sarpy County.
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
Jinxing Mike Smith
All that talk about depth pushing Mike Smith out of his starting spot at left tackle may have taunted the football gods this week, as Smith went down with a broken leg on Tuesday. The "glass half full" perspective is to be grateful it happened this season rather than last season, when depth was sorely lacking. Smith might still qualify for a medical hardship and be able to play in 2011; we'll see how that works out.
Of course, the next left tackle, Jermarcus Hardrick left practice on Monday in an ambulance after suffering heat exhaustion in the ridiculous heat this week, so Nebraska is down to redshirt freshman Jeremiah Sirles at left tackle for now. All this points out the importance of depth, as it doesn't take much to take a position of strength and turn it into a weakness. Just look at I-back last season: at this point, fans thought that with Roy Helu and Quentin Castille established, and Rex Burkhead coming in, I-back wasn't a problem. And by the time the Texas Tech game came around, poof!
Today's World-Herald reports that former cornerbacks Anthony West and Anthony Blue are working their way back. West might be called on at safety, while Blue is simply getting himself back onto the field after a devastating knee injury. I guess I had long penciled in Courtney Osborne and P.J. Smith as the safeties this upcoming season, but not so fast.
An interesting read from Olin Buchanan of Rivals, where he rates each part of each team in the Big XII. The Huskers backfield is rated fifth; somewhat surprising considering the lack of production in 2009. Even more surprising is that the receivers were ranked sixth in the Big XII. Buchanan expects big things from the offensive line, ranking them tops in the Big XII this season, though nobody from Nebraska makes his preseason first or second team all-Big XII list. Go figure.
On defense, Buchanan has NU's defensive line tops, which I can see. Third at linebacker might be a bit of a stretch, and the Husker secondary is second only to Texas. Coaching staff is ranked third behind Texas and Oklahoma. A little-too-glowing preseason report card, I'd suggest.
Of course, the next left tackle, Jermarcus Hardrick left practice on Monday in an ambulance after suffering heat exhaustion in the ridiculous heat this week, so Nebraska is down to redshirt freshman Jeremiah Sirles at left tackle for now. All this points out the importance of depth, as it doesn't take much to take a position of strength and turn it into a weakness. Just look at I-back last season: at this point, fans thought that with Roy Helu and Quentin Castille established, and Rex Burkhead coming in, I-back wasn't a problem. And by the time the Texas Tech game came around, poof!
Today's World-Herald reports that former cornerbacks Anthony West and Anthony Blue are working their way back. West might be called on at safety, while Blue is simply getting himself back onto the field after a devastating knee injury. I guess I had long penciled in Courtney Osborne and P.J. Smith as the safeties this upcoming season, but not so fast.
An interesting read from Olin Buchanan of Rivals, where he rates each part of each team in the Big XII. The Huskers backfield is rated fifth; somewhat surprising considering the lack of production in 2009. Even more surprising is that the receivers were ranked sixth in the Big XII. Buchanan expects big things from the offensive line, ranking them tops in the Big XII this season, though nobody from Nebraska makes his preseason first or second team all-Big XII list. Go figure.
On defense, Buchanan has NU's defensive line tops, which I can see. Third at linebacker might be a bit of a stretch, and the Husker secondary is second only to Texas. Coaching staff is ranked third behind Texas and Oklahoma. A little-too-glowing preseason report card, I'd suggest.
Sunday, August 08, 2010
Sunday Night Dessert: Preseason Hype is Just That
It's easy to overreact to the news that Nebraska is ranked #9 in the preseason coaches poll. Is it a sign that Nebraska is back? Nope. I've said it before, and I'll say it again. Nebraska will truly be "back" when nobody asks about being "back". Nebraska is better than they've been in years, but that's not saying much. This #9 rating is more of a result of the schedule than anything else. Subtract Oklahoma, Texas Tech, and Virginia Tech from the schedule, and replace with Texas (in Lincoln minus Colt McCoy after a last second loss in Dallas last December) and two teams with a losing record in 2009.
My favorite criticism of this is that Nebraska is ranked as highly as they are because of past history. Rock M Nation's Bill Connelly sums it up quite nicely:
Of course, then we hear talk about Nebraska "not having beaten a top 19 team since blah blah blah". Again, what does the past (with different players and coaches) have to do with anything? Is Tom Osborne or Frank Solich coaching the Huskers? Nope. Is Bill Callahan coaching the Huskers? Thank God he's not. So what relevance does Callahan's suckage mean to 2010? What is relevant is Pelini's record: top ten defense in 2003 at Nebraska. Top defense in 2004 at Oklahoma. Great defenses at LSU in 2005 and 2006, and a National Championship defense in 2007. A defense that improved from start to finish in 2008, and one of the best defenses in the country in 2009. That's a relevant track record, and if Pelini says the 2010 defense could be even better, then you disregard it at your own risk.
As we go through preseason practice, we'll be treated to more stories about players stepping it up. Which is all fine and well, but it's all somewhat irrelevant until the Huskers actually play somebody. Which likely won't be until September 18th in Seattle. Take Zac Lee. We know he didn't have a great season in 2009. We know about the injury. We know about the lack of receivers. We know about his mistakes. As things progress, we'll see whether he's truly able to step his game up to the next level. Or whether one of the other quarterbacks will make a bigger step up. We saw Cody Green wilt under the spotlight as a true freshman, and we simply don't know anything about Taylor Martinez other than an impressive debut in a scrimmage.
One story that I find intriguing is Barney Cotton's confidence in his offensive line. When he's talking about Mike Smith going from the starter at left tackle to being a backup at guard or center, you have to realize that something is up on the offensive line. That change is an infusion of depth that wasn't there last year. Again, it's too early to bank on anything...but when a senior loses his starting job, that's a sign of change. Especially in a position as important as left tackle.
Want more proof about the lack of substance this time of year? How about considering pickles as a "secret weapon"? Not saying that it's a bad idea...but it's not really a "secret" or any sort of "weapon" either...
Wasn't it nice to see football on television tonight? Yeah, it was an exhibition, and yeah, it wasn't very good. (3 field goals and a defensive touchdown until the closing moments.) But at least it was a sign of better things to come, especially after a ridiculously sweltering day outside.
You know one thing that bugged me tonight? Hunter Mahan won the Bridgestone Invitational today, and was pretty much ignored. Instead, the big story was the guy who finished in next to last place. I mean, if playing bad golf is now newsworthy, maybe it's time for me to get my golf clubs out of storage.
My favorite criticism of this is that Nebraska is ranked as highly as they are because of past history. Rock M Nation's Bill Connelly sums it up quite nicely:
If Missouri had put together the exact set of circumstances (dominant defense leads to North title, near-upset in Big 12 title game, and easy bowl win ... and loses transcendent star in offseason), they would be ranked in the #15-20 range to start the season. But Nebraska being Nebraska, they shoot straight to, in some cases, the Top 5.
As we go through preseason practice, we'll be treated to more stories about players stepping it up. Which is all fine and well, but it's all somewhat irrelevant until the Huskers actually play somebody. Which likely won't be until September 18th in Seattle. Take Zac Lee. We know he didn't have a great season in 2009. We know about the injury. We know about the lack of receivers. We know about his mistakes. As things progress, we'll see whether he's truly able to step his game up to the next level. Or whether one of the other quarterbacks will make a bigger step up. We saw Cody Green wilt under the spotlight as a true freshman, and we simply don't know anything about Taylor Martinez other than an impressive debut in a scrimmage.
One story that I find intriguing is Barney Cotton's confidence in his offensive line. When he's talking about Mike Smith going from the starter at left tackle to being a backup at guard or center, you have to realize that something is up on the offensive line. That change is an infusion of depth that wasn't there last year. Again, it's too early to bank on anything...but when a senior loses his starting job, that's a sign of change. Especially in a position as important as left tackle.
Want more proof about the lack of substance this time of year? How about considering pickles as a "secret weapon"? Not saying that it's a bad idea...but it's not really a "secret" or any sort of "weapon" either...
Wasn't it nice to see football on television tonight? Yeah, it was an exhibition, and yeah, it wasn't very good. (3 field goals and a defensive touchdown until the closing moments.) But at least it was a sign of better things to come, especially after a ridiculously sweltering day outside.
You know one thing that bugged me tonight? Hunter Mahan won the Bridgestone Invitational today, and was pretty much ignored. Instead, the big story was the guy who finished in next to last place. I mean, if playing bad golf is now newsworthy, maybe it's time for me to get my golf clubs out of storage.
Thursday, August 05, 2010
Big Ten Championship Game Goes to Indy
The only surprise about today's announcement that the inaugural Big Ten championship game was going to be played in Indianapolis was the timing, just days after the Big Ten held their meetings. Indianapolis is a safe choice: modern stadium, centrally located, and indoors, so weather isn't a concern. That being said, I haven't decided whether it makes more sense to rotate the game or pick a regular home for the Big Ten championship. I like the idea of playing the game at Lambeau (but only in an afternoon timeslot, prior to the Pac-12 Championship game) occasionally. Chicago? More convenient for Husker fans, I suppose...but a remodeled Soldier Field doesn't have the same history as Lambeau, yet has all the negatives (grass field in a bad weather locale). Detroit? A little to close to the Weasels, truth be told.
Cleveland or Cincinnati? Perhaps in a rotation, but again...even more negatives, and now a home game for the Buckeyes. Philadelphia? Might as well hold it in Jerry World; no conflicts there anymore.
Tom Shatel learned a little bit about the psyche of the Big Ten conference this week at media days in Chicago. The interesting perspective is how the Big Ten views themselves. Big Ten folks see no issue with putting Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State in one division, with Nebraska, Iowa, and Wisconsin in the other. From their perspective, that's splitting the six big names in the conference even-steven.
Of course, to those of us outsiders, equating Iowa and Wisconsin with Michigan and Ohio State seems ludicrous. Sure, it's the easiest way to split things, but not necessarily the most balanced. But that's the difference in the mindsets of the two conferences.
Another mindset is the importance of the Rose Bowl. I've openly mocked the Rose Bowl for years. In the past, it was the game that you generally ignored after the rush of the early New Year's Day games (Cotton, Citrus, and Fiesta Bowls) and the big games of the day in the Sugar and Orange. The "Irrelevent Yawner Bowl" was the perfect opportunity to step away from the television and have a holiday dinner. Walk the dog, reload the fridge, etc. The game would be on in the background, but it was just that: background noise.
In 2002, when Nebraska played, I joined thousands of other Husker fans in Pasadena and encountered the worst-operated bowl game I've ever attended. Awesome tailgating, but that was it. Locals were upset that Nebraska wasn't a Big Ten team. The stadium was a dilapidated fire trap that wasn't prepared for 40,000 fans, let alone the 93,000 fans that had tickets. Arrived outside the gates at 3:45 pm for a 5:20 kickoff, and barely made it to my seats as the Huskers took the field. Others in our group missed the third quarter in a fruitless search for food from the concession stands. After the game, my wife nearly got crushed in a stampede as stadium crowd control funneled fans out of the stadium into barricaded walkways from both ends. In the middle, the two crowds met up with the only escape route being to jump over the metal barricades.
So when I read Big Ten fans talking about the Rose Bowl being the ultimate destination for a college football season, all I have to do is roll my eyes. I suppose the parade is nice, but the Rose Bowl pales in comparison to Phoenix and the Fiesta Bowl or Miami and the Orange Bowl. And I have to figure it pales to New Orleans and the Sugar Bowl. Granddaddy of them all? Well, on that particular night in early 2002, Grandpa overfilled his Depends.
But that's the mindset of the Big Ten. It's their tradition. It's how they view things. And you know what, if Nebraska fans don't share that viewpoint, well, I'm sure that's our problem, not theirs.
It's going to be a learning experience to learn this Big Ten culture over the next few years. I'm sure Nebraska will have the opportunity to suggest changes and provide a different point-of-view, but in the end, it's going to be up to Nebraska to accept much of what the Big Ten has, whether we particularly agree with it or not.
Cleveland or Cincinnati? Perhaps in a rotation, but again...even more negatives, and now a home game for the Buckeyes. Philadelphia? Might as well hold it in Jerry World; no conflicts there anymore.
Tom Shatel learned a little bit about the psyche of the Big Ten conference this week at media days in Chicago. The interesting perspective is how the Big Ten views themselves. Big Ten folks see no issue with putting Michigan, Ohio State, and Penn State in one division, with Nebraska, Iowa, and Wisconsin in the other. From their perspective, that's splitting the six big names in the conference even-steven.
Of course, to those of us outsiders, equating Iowa and Wisconsin with Michigan and Ohio State seems ludicrous. Sure, it's the easiest way to split things, but not necessarily the most balanced. But that's the difference in the mindsets of the two conferences.
Another mindset is the importance of the Rose Bowl. I've openly mocked the Rose Bowl for years. In the past, it was the game that you generally ignored after the rush of the early New Year's Day games (Cotton, Citrus, and Fiesta Bowls) and the big games of the day in the Sugar and Orange. The "Irrelevent Yawner Bowl" was the perfect opportunity to step away from the television and have a holiday dinner. Walk the dog, reload the fridge, etc. The game would be on in the background, but it was just that: background noise.
In 2002, when Nebraska played, I joined thousands of other Husker fans in Pasadena and encountered the worst-operated bowl game I've ever attended. Awesome tailgating, but that was it. Locals were upset that Nebraska wasn't a Big Ten team. The stadium was a dilapidated fire trap that wasn't prepared for 40,000 fans, let alone the 93,000 fans that had tickets. Arrived outside the gates at 3:45 pm for a 5:20 kickoff, and barely made it to my seats as the Huskers took the field. Others in our group missed the third quarter in a fruitless search for food from the concession stands. After the game, my wife nearly got crushed in a stampede as stadium crowd control funneled fans out of the stadium into barricaded walkways from both ends. In the middle, the two crowds met up with the only escape route being to jump over the metal barricades.
So when I read Big Ten fans talking about the Rose Bowl being the ultimate destination for a college football season, all I have to do is roll my eyes. I suppose the parade is nice, but the Rose Bowl pales in comparison to Phoenix and the Fiesta Bowl or Miami and the Orange Bowl. And I have to figure it pales to New Orleans and the Sugar Bowl. Granddaddy of them all? Well, on that particular night in early 2002, Grandpa overfilled his Depends.
But that's the mindset of the Big Ten. It's their tradition. It's how they view things. And you know what, if Nebraska fans don't share that viewpoint, well, I'm sure that's our problem, not theirs.
It's going to be a learning experience to learn this Big Ten culture over the next few years. I'm sure Nebraska will have the opportunity to suggest changes and provide a different point-of-view, but in the end, it's going to be up to Nebraska to accept much of what the Big Ten has, whether we particularly agree with it or not.
Monday, August 02, 2010
Monday Night Beer: Paying To Park In BFE & Nine Conference Games in the Big Ten?
Depending on how you want to spin it, the Omaha Royals either have continued the tradition of having free parking for fans...or have joined the rest of minor league baseball in charging you $5 to park. Or go into the middle with $2 parking. Confusing? Not really... 450 of the best parking spaces will charge $5, while 900 more will cost you $2. The furthest out 450 spots will be free. So if you arrive late (because you got stuck in traffic driving out to BFE), you'll pay. If you arrive early and don't mind a nice walk, you can park for free.
In fairness to the Royals, this parking is cheaper than most of the other Pacific Coast League teams. $5-$6 parking is pretty much the standard in the PCL. Nashville only charges $3 while Sacramento charges $8 to $10.
It'll be interesting how this works when the rest of the development around BFE takes place...or maybe I should say if, as we really haven't heard of any other development going on out there. But hey, that's not my problem...that's the problem for the taxpayers of Sarpy County.
Turning east towards Chicago, it seems that all of the Nebraska sports media that are testing the Big Ten's media days are seeing quite a different operation. All 11 coaches spoke to the media today, and it appears that coaches and players will meet the media again tomorrow. The general perception seems to be that the Big Ten is more than happy to have Nebraska on board and are seeming to go out of their way to accomodate the new kids on the block. Or at least make a good impression on the media just now being introduced to the Big Ten. Or maybe it's just that Nebraska and it's fans haven't done anything to offend the other Big Ten schools yet.
It makes me wonder what the Big Ten's media credential policy is for next year in terms of the new media. (i.e us bloggers) The three-day Big XII media days are simply impractical for most of us to cover; we have day jobs that pay our bills. But a one-day trip to Chicago might be possible to swing... just something to ponder as we move forward.
I don't think I've ever seen Tom Osborne smile as wide as he did posing with Joe Paterno and Jim Delaney in Chicago today. I'm sure someone cracked a joke to get all three beaming, but still, I get the feeling that Osborne is sincerely happy with Nebraska's move to the Big Ten.
One thing for sure is, right now, we're still in the "romance" part of the switch. Everything is new and exciting, and everybody is saying nice things about us.
The big news of the day is that Delaney wants to play nine conference games a season, up from eight. If that happens, each team will only avoid two conference foes each season. That's the upside. The downside is that means one less non-conference game. With football budgets the way they are, you know the "money" games aren't going away...which means that the games that get dropped are the better matchups. I think the marquee matchups against teams like UCLA, Tennessee, and Miami are safe. But some of the matchups against Fresno State and Southern Miss could end up getting scuttled because of the need to play that extra conference game. In an ideal world, NU would go on the road for one non-conference game each season, but with the prospect of playing five conference games on the road every other season, finances dictate that Nebraska can only play a non-conference road game every other year.
Personally, I'd lean against the nine conference game schedule...but I have an inherent bias against it. Nebraska is starting with a clean slate with no clear rivalries that we're hoping to keep intact. So the idea of playing 8 conference games a year, with the prospect of playing a name BCS foe and one or two "up and coming" mid majors sounds like a good match to me. Replacing one of those "up and coming" mid-major games with a conference opponent that we'll see in a year or two down the line anyway doesn't sound like a deal to me.
But I also see the point of, say a Wisconsin, who will see one fewer of their traditional opponents when Nebraska appears on their schedule. Ideally, the game that gets dropped is the one against Schmuckhead State or some other Sun Belt or 1-AA team...but you know and I know that those games are played for money, and that'll be the last one dropped.
In fairness to the Royals, this parking is cheaper than most of the other Pacific Coast League teams. $5-$6 parking is pretty much the standard in the PCL. Nashville only charges $3 while Sacramento charges $8 to $10.
It'll be interesting how this works when the rest of the development around BFE takes place...or maybe I should say if, as we really haven't heard of any other development going on out there. But hey, that's not my problem...that's the problem for the taxpayers of Sarpy County.
Turning east towards Chicago, it seems that all of the Nebraska sports media that are testing the Big Ten's media days are seeing quite a different operation. All 11 coaches spoke to the media today, and it appears that coaches and players will meet the media again tomorrow. The general perception seems to be that the Big Ten is more than happy to have Nebraska on board and are seeming to go out of their way to accomodate the new kids on the block. Or at least make a good impression on the media just now being introduced to the Big Ten. Or maybe it's just that Nebraska and it's fans haven't done anything to offend the other Big Ten schools yet.
It makes me wonder what the Big Ten's media credential policy is for next year in terms of the new media. (i.e us bloggers) The three-day Big XII media days are simply impractical for most of us to cover; we have day jobs that pay our bills. But a one-day trip to Chicago might be possible to swing... just something to ponder as we move forward.
 |
| Photo Courtesy Big Ten Conference |
One thing for sure is, right now, we're still in the "romance" part of the switch. Everything is new and exciting, and everybody is saying nice things about us.
The big news of the day is that Delaney wants to play nine conference games a season, up from eight. If that happens, each team will only avoid two conference foes each season. That's the upside. The downside is that means one less non-conference game. With football budgets the way they are, you know the "money" games aren't going away...which means that the games that get dropped are the better matchups. I think the marquee matchups against teams like UCLA, Tennessee, and Miami are safe. But some of the matchups against Fresno State and Southern Miss could end up getting scuttled because of the need to play that extra conference game. In an ideal world, NU would go on the road for one non-conference game each season, but with the prospect of playing five conference games on the road every other season, finances dictate that Nebraska can only play a non-conference road game every other year.
Personally, I'd lean against the nine conference game schedule...but I have an inherent bias against it. Nebraska is starting with a clean slate with no clear rivalries that we're hoping to keep intact. So the idea of playing 8 conference games a year, with the prospect of playing a name BCS foe and one or two "up and coming" mid majors sounds like a good match to me. Replacing one of those "up and coming" mid-major games with a conference opponent that we'll see in a year or two down the line anyway doesn't sound like a deal to me.
But I also see the point of, say a Wisconsin, who will see one fewer of their traditional opponents when Nebraska appears on their schedule. Ideally, the game that gets dropped is the one against Schmuckhead State or some other Sun Belt or 1-AA team...but you know and I know that those games are played for money, and that'll be the last one dropped.
Friday, July 30, 2010
Does Bo Pelini See Something the Rest of College Football Doesn't?
With college football beat writers focusing on the Big XII this week, the national sports media started throwing up their asterisks over Nebraska's preseason "Top Ten" status. Yahoo's Matt Hinton (aka "Dr. Saturday") started it on Tuesday by reminding us that Nebraska lost three games last season despite holding the opposition under 17 points:
SI's Stewart Mandel highlighted Nebraska as the most likely candidate to be the team that doesn't live up to their preseason hype:
Then the Columbia Tribune's Dave Matter reported an undercurrent of skepticism from the rest of the assembled Big XII media in Dallas:
Before Husker fans get mad, these writers aren't telling us anything that we already knew. Remember all the complaining about Shawn Watson last season? The Husker offense was bad last season. Not even mediocre. Bad. Very bad. And frankly, I agree that the preseason hype might be a little much.
But at the Big XII Media days this week, Bo Pelini made a point to address some of the concerns people raised last season, saying that Nebraska should see improved production at both quarterback and on the offensive line. The offensive line was a big focus for me last season, as Barney Cotton was unable to substitute much in the latter half of the 2009 campaign. Now, Pelini says that the depth on the offensive line is "not even close" to where it was prior to now. You don't read about it elsewhere, but four offensive linemen redshirted last season. Brent Qvale was moving up the depth chart until he got injured late in preseason practice. Add in junior college transfer Jemarcus Hardrick, and suddenly Nebraska's depth just doubled.
We know that it all starts up front, and last season, Nebraska had to "dial it down" on offense. Tight ends took playing time away from wide receivers and were assigned to help block. Mike McNeill seemingly disappeared at times in the passing game as Nebraska focused on pounding the ball. In the last month of the season, the only substitution on the line was with Mike Caputo at center, and frequently that was to spell an injured Jacob Hickman.
I understand where the media outside of Nebraska are getting their skepticism; in fact, I share some of it. But what I don't understand is the assumption that "they were bad last year, so they'll be bad this season." Then these same sportswriters reverse field and point out that both Washington and Texas A&M will be much better in 2010, despite having losing seasons in 2009.
I'm not suggesting that Nebraska's offense will be great in 2010...just that they'll be better. This isn't going to be an offense that's going to put up 45 points a game week in and week out. But if they can finish off drives and run some more clock, they could become an effective counterpart to a defense that should still be very good, even though they'll sorely miss #93.
I think Bo Pelini sees that. But until the team actually hits the field, skepticism will remain, and impossible to argue against.
The old-school preseason hype as a Big 12 frontrunner and darkhorse national candidate still depends on a defense, even minus transcendent interior-line wrecking ball Ndamukong Suh. But there's no doubt that the next step in the "return to glory" timeline will require more consistent competence under center.
I can think of at least one soon-to-be preseason top 10 pick coming off what was, at the time, a very uncharacteristic bowl performance: Nebraska.
Last we saw the Huskers, they were dismantling Arizona, 33-0, in the Holiday Bowl, to cement their first 10-win season in six years. Heisman finalist Ndamukong Suh led another dominant performance by the nation's seventh-ranked defense. That part was par for the course. Quarterback Zac Lee ran 18 times for 65 yards and threw a 74-yard touchdown. Where on earth did that come from?
No one seems convinced that Nebraska runs away with the North Division. Yes, the Huskers are a heavy favorite, but I heard from more than a few writers something along the lines of, "I picked Nebraska, but I wouldn’t be surprised to see Missouri win the thing." If the Tigers had showed up against Navy and won the Texas Bowl, my guess is Nebraska and Missouri split the first-place votes evenly.
But at the Big XII Media days this week, Bo Pelini made a point to address some of the concerns people raised last season, saying that Nebraska should see improved production at both quarterback and on the offensive line. The offensive line was a big focus for me last season, as Barney Cotton was unable to substitute much in the latter half of the 2009 campaign. Now, Pelini says that the depth on the offensive line is "not even close" to where it was prior to now. You don't read about it elsewhere, but four offensive linemen redshirted last season. Brent Qvale was moving up the depth chart until he got injured late in preseason practice. Add in junior college transfer Jemarcus Hardrick, and suddenly Nebraska's depth just doubled.
We know that it all starts up front, and last season, Nebraska had to "dial it down" on offense. Tight ends took playing time away from wide receivers and were assigned to help block. Mike McNeill seemingly disappeared at times in the passing game as Nebraska focused on pounding the ball. In the last month of the season, the only substitution on the line was with Mike Caputo at center, and frequently that was to spell an injured Jacob Hickman.
I understand where the media outside of Nebraska are getting their skepticism; in fact, I share some of it. But what I don't understand is the assumption that "they were bad last year, so they'll be bad this season." Then these same sportswriters reverse field and point out that both Washington and Texas A&M will be much better in 2010, despite having losing seasons in 2009.
I'm not suggesting that Nebraska's offense will be great in 2010...just that they'll be better. This isn't going to be an offense that's going to put up 45 points a game week in and week out. But if they can finish off drives and run some more clock, they could become an effective counterpart to a defense that should still be very good, even though they'll sorely miss #93.
I think Bo Pelini sees that. But until the team actually hits the field, skepticism will remain, and impossible to argue against.
Monday, July 26, 2010
2010 Husker Motto: Finish.
 |
| Photo Courtesy of "Unsportsmanlike Conduct" via Facebook |
Some will remind us that it's insane to lose an Outland Trophy winner (who turned out to be a legitimate Heisman Trophy candidate as well) and still expect to contend for a championship. Point taken...but teams lose players all the time in college football. Suh was special, to be sure...but Nebraska may have enough left in the tank to be pretty good on defense. Add in Pelini's proven track record in college football: whether it was 2003 Nebraska, 2004 Oklahoma, 2005-07 LSU, or 2009 Nebraska, Bo Pelini puts an outstanding defense on the field. Even that 2008 defense became ok by the end of the season, especially when you consider how the 2007 season ended defensively.
And yes, Nebraska's offense was putrid most of last season, though injuries help explain things. Zac Lee's arm injury. Roy Helu's shoulder and Rex Burkhead's foot. Offensive line injuries that eliminated any possibility of substitution in the final five games of 2009. The offense muddled through, and got a little bit better in the Holiday Bowl after a few weeks of healing. The offense has nine returning starters, and a three-way battle to be the starting quarterback is currently underway. My money is still on Zac Lee against Western Kentucky, but I'd keep an eye on Taylor Martinez.
One thing I did hear today sent chills down my spine...and for all the wrong reason. Defensive end Pierre Allen mentioned that Nebraska "definitely" could content for a national championship in an interview on KOZN's "Unsportsmanlike Conduct" today. Everybody talks it...even Baylor players mentioned it. But I also remember the last time I heard that coming from the mouths of a Husker player...and how it turned out. AJ the Huskerh8er loves to draw parallels between 2007 and 2010. And while I'm convinced this time is different, I also admit I didn't see that 2007 flameout coming like it did.
Looking ahead to this season, I just want to see improvement. Don't talk about it. Do it. I like the focus on "finishing" each and every game. Finish like they did at Missouri in the monsoon last season. Don't make the mistakes that killed them against Texas Tech and Iowa State. And continually push themselves to be even better, to make that one extra play, gain that extra yard, make that tackle, and make that last second irrelevant. Finish.
Friday, July 23, 2010
Mike Guentzel Returns to Omaha To Join UNO Staff
If UNO hockey fans thought a staff with both Dean Blais and Mike Hastings was a home run, I can only imagine what some folks are thinking tonight with the news that Mike Guentzel is joining the UNO coaching staff for the upcoming season. Guentzel will replace Nick Fohr, who will return to his old position of director of hockey operations, replacing Dave Noel-Bernier, who in turn is leaving to take a position in the USHL.
If you liked the hire of Mike Hastings, you absolutely have to be ecstatic about adding Guentzel to the staff. Guentzel's resume speaks for itself. He got his head coaching start with the St. Paul Vulcans in 1988, and won the Junior A National Championship in 1991. In 1992, he took over the Omaha Lancers, leading the Lancers to back-to-back championships in 1992-93 and 1993-94. That 1992-93 season, his top assistant was Hastings. He then left Omaha to join the staff at Minnesota for 14 years, during which the Gophers played in five Frozen Fours and won three WCHA championships and two National Championships. He then went on to be an assistant coach with Colorado College two years ago, coaching his son, then became the head coach of the Des Moines Buccaneers last season.
Guentzel was also a top candidate to be the first head coach of the Mavs, and was on my list of leading candidates to take over the Mavs last season. Guetnzel did work briefly with Dean Blais in 1994 on the US Junior National hockey team, so there's a bit of a background there.
So UNO's staff has one of the most accomplished head coaches in college hockey in Dean Blais, and one of the most accomplished assistants in Mike Guentzel. And yes, one of the most accomplished junior hockey coaches in Mike Hastings. And yes...THAT'S a home run staff now.
I don't know how long this staff will stay together at this point; all three coaches have a record of accomplishment. And frankly, I'm not sure you can automatically assume that if Dean Blais were to get hit by a bus that Mike Hastings would be the next head coach: Guentzel's resume is better.
Things keep looking brighter and brighter for UNO hockey.
If you liked the hire of Mike Hastings, you absolutely have to be ecstatic about adding Guentzel to the staff. Guentzel's resume speaks for itself. He got his head coaching start with the St. Paul Vulcans in 1988, and won the Junior A National Championship in 1991. In 1992, he took over the Omaha Lancers, leading the Lancers to back-to-back championships in 1992-93 and 1993-94. That 1992-93 season, his top assistant was Hastings. He then left Omaha to join the staff at Minnesota for 14 years, during which the Gophers played in five Frozen Fours and won three WCHA championships and two National Championships. He then went on to be an assistant coach with Colorado College two years ago, coaching his son, then became the head coach of the Des Moines Buccaneers last season.
Guentzel was also a top candidate to be the first head coach of the Mavs, and was on my list of leading candidates to take over the Mavs last season. Guetnzel did work briefly with Dean Blais in 1994 on the US Junior National hockey team, so there's a bit of a background there.
So UNO's staff has one of the most accomplished head coaches in college hockey in Dean Blais, and one of the most accomplished assistants in Mike Guentzel. And yes, one of the most accomplished junior hockey coaches in Mike Hastings. And yes...THAT'S a home run staff now.
I don't know how long this staff will stay together at this point; all three coaches have a record of accomplishment. And frankly, I'm not sure you can automatically assume that if Dean Blais were to get hit by a bus that Mike Hastings would be the next head coach: Guentzel's resume is better.
Things keep looking brighter and brighter for UNO hockey.
Thursday, July 22, 2010
Radio Waves
Not sure what was up with Omaha's KOZN-AM ("1620 The Zone") today, but there were unknown fill-in hosts with both Kevin Kugler and Mike'l Severe both on vacation. The fill-in's tried...but frankly, with nothing really sports related going on today...it was pretty much DOA. Pretty disappointing; in fact, I'd suggest that they just pipe in the Cubs vs. Cardinals game tomorrow afternoon. After today, you do have to admire the job those two do in keeping the show fairly fresh..even in the dog days of summer. You just don't realize what you've got until it's gone, I guess.
I think that also might explain why KOZN was nominated for the national Marconi Award for "Sports Station of the Year" alongside stations in New York City, Miami, Detroit, and (believe it or not) Bemidji. They certainly do a heck of a job with 7 hours of local sports talk each weekday, plus numerous specials throughout the year. It's easy to take issue with what they might be saying...but at least they are trying, unlike their competition.
I was reminded of this when I saw a tweet from former Omaha sports talk host Matt Perrault, who headed to Des Moines after his Omaha show was cancelled. Seems he's trying to trying his best to spin things for him:
Yeah... right... I guess the Northern Iowa upset over Kansas was interesting in March...but it's now July. A guy from Northern Iowa and the Vikings backup quarterback does not make for scintillating radio. But hey, it sounds like he's found his niche. Good for him that he's found a place in a smaller market where he can succeed.
In hindsight, I do think I may have been a little too harsh on his show's poor ratings. I recently learned that last summer, KXSP-AM's ratings fell to 0 after Perrault was let go. Even last fall, the station's ratings were half of what they were the year prior with Perrault's show on the air. It sure makes me wonder what the point of keeping "Big Sports 590" on the air when it seems virtually nobody is listening to it.
KFAB recently received an extension to be Omaha's affiliate for Husker sports through 2014. Not that it was any surprise. Certainly KXSP could clear up as much airtime as they could to carry anything and everything Husker related, but the tradition of the Huskers on KFAB counts for something. And frankly, as long as they keep Steve Pederson apologist Jim Rose relegated to the morning show and off the broadcasts, it's fine. And he makes just as much sense as a political commentator now as he did in his days mangling Husker play-by-play calls.
I think that also might explain why KOZN was nominated for the national Marconi Award for "Sports Station of the Year" alongside stations in New York City, Miami, Detroit, and (believe it or not) Bemidji. They certainly do a heck of a job with 7 hours of local sports talk each weekday, plus numerous specials throughout the year. It's easy to take issue with what they might be saying...but at least they are trying, unlike their competition.
I was reminded of this when I saw a tweet from former Omaha sports talk host Matt Perrault, who headed to Des Moines after his Omaha show was cancelled. Seems he's trying to trying his best to spin things for him:
Today's show. Prime example of why DMS > Omaha to work sports talk. Guests: Ali Farokmanesh (ESPYs) - Sage Rosenfels (camp) on July 16th.
In hindsight, I do think I may have been a little too harsh on his show's poor ratings. I recently learned that last summer, KXSP-AM's ratings fell to 0 after Perrault was let go. Even last fall, the station's ratings were half of what they were the year prior with Perrault's show on the air. It sure makes me wonder what the point of keeping "Big Sports 590" on the air when it seems virtually nobody is listening to it.
KFAB recently received an extension to be Omaha's affiliate for Husker sports through 2014. Not that it was any surprise. Certainly KXSP could clear up as much airtime as they could to carry anything and everything Husker related, but the tradition of the Huskers on KFAB counts for something. And frankly, as long as they keep Steve Pederson apologist Jim Rose relegated to the morning show and off the broadcasts, it's fine. And he makes just as much sense as a political commentator now as he did in his days mangling Husker play-by-play calls.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
